What teachers learn from science and arts integration in a design-based learning framework: An Australian study

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Valerie Lovejoy, V. Prain, Chris Musk, Lydia Poljak, Drew Roberts, I. Stewart
{"title":"What teachers learn from science and arts integration in a design-based learning framework: An Australian study","authors":"Valerie Lovejoy, V. Prain, Chris Musk, Lydia Poljak, Drew Roberts, I. Stewart","doi":"10.3316/INFORMIT.748989563826656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Secondary teachers face a plethora of advice on why and how to integrate science with the arts for mutual benefit. Diverse rationales for this integration are matched by wide variation in recommended programs. However, there is limited research on what exactly teachers learn, or need to learn, over time beyond the life of any particular approach or topic, to succeed. In this paper we contribute insights into this issue by analysing, in the light of relevant literature, participant teachers’ learning after four years experience of a standalone, two-day annual program that aimed to integrate science and the arts in a whole-school approach. Our case study entailed interviews with the principal and key participant teachers, observational notes on program enactment, and participation in teacher planning and review meetings. We found that: (a) participant teachers perceived multiple benefits from this curricular innovation; (b) the integration was enabled by a design-based learning framework, and (c) diverse conditions were needed for this innovation to be sustained, with implications for other forms of program integration.","PeriodicalId":46340,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Educational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3316/INFORMIT.748989563826656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Secondary teachers face a plethora of advice on why and how to integrate science with the arts for mutual benefit. Diverse rationales for this integration are matched by wide variation in recommended programs. However, there is limited research on what exactly teachers learn, or need to learn, over time beyond the life of any particular approach or topic, to succeed. In this paper we contribute insights into this issue by analysing, in the light of relevant literature, participant teachers’ learning after four years experience of a standalone, two-day annual program that aimed to integrate science and the arts in a whole-school approach. Our case study entailed interviews with the principal and key participant teachers, observational notes on program enactment, and participation in teacher planning and review meetings. We found that: (a) participant teachers perceived multiple benefits from this curricular innovation; (b) the integration was enabled by a design-based learning framework, and (c) diverse conditions were needed for this innovation to be sustained, with implications for other forms of program integration.
在以设计为基础的学习框架中,教师从科学和艺术的整合中学到了什么:一项澳大利亚的研究
中学教师面临着大量关于为什么以及如何将科学与艺术相结合以实现互利的建议。这种整合的各种理由与推荐方案的广泛变化相匹配。然而,对于教师究竟学习了什么,或者需要学习什么,在任何特定的方法或主题之外,随着时间的推移,才能取得成功,研究是有限的。在本文中,我们根据相关文献,通过分析参与教师在四年独立的、为期两天的年度计划后的学习情况,对这一问题做出了见解,该计划旨在将科学和艺术融入全校的方法。我们的案例研究包括与校长和主要参与教师的访谈,对项目制定的观察笔记,以及参与教师计划和审查会议。我们发现:(a)参与教师从课程创新中获得了多重利益;(b)整合是通过基于设计的学习框架实现的,(c)这种创新需要多种条件才能持续下去,这对其他形式的项目整合有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Issues in Educational Research
Issues in Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Issues in Educational Research is a refereed academic research journal founded by the Western Australian Institute for Educational Research in 1991. From 1995, IIER has been published jointly by Australia"s Institutes for Educational Research in New South Wales, Northern Territory, South Australia and Western Australia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信