China colonizing Africa narrative on social media: An issue activation and response perspective

IF 1 4区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Simon Matingwina
{"title":"China colonizing Africa narrative on social media: An issue activation and response perspective","authors":"Simon Matingwina","doi":"10.1386/jams_00009_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of ‘China colonizing Africa’ received significant attention in both traditional and social media in the periods before, during and after the Forum on China Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) 2018 meeting. This study traces these discourses on YouTube, which is one of the social media platforms widely used to raise awareness and also influence public opinion on various issues. Thematic and content analysis are used to identify the dominant themes discussed in the selected videos and also to identify the sentiments expressed by viewers in the comments posted. The issue activation and response model is used to create meaning from the data. The study finds that the themes and the sentiments reflect the dominance of pessimistic and optimistic perspectives on the Africa–China relationship. Furthermore, the study shows that the themes discussed have not offered new perspectives but instead the discussions have repackaged old narratives as part of agenda building efforts by the protagonists. The study, therefore argues that social media have become important platforms for activation of issues on the Africa–China relationship, hence the persistence of these old narratives is attributed to lack of effective responses to issues on social media by both African countries and Chinese officials.","PeriodicalId":43702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Media Studies","volume":"33 1","pages":"23-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00009_1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The issue of ‘China colonizing Africa’ received significant attention in both traditional and social media in the periods before, during and after the Forum on China Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) 2018 meeting. This study traces these discourses on YouTube, which is one of the social media platforms widely used to raise awareness and also influence public opinion on various issues. Thematic and content analysis are used to identify the dominant themes discussed in the selected videos and also to identify the sentiments expressed by viewers in the comments posted. The issue activation and response model is used to create meaning from the data. The study finds that the themes and the sentiments reflect the dominance of pessimistic and optimistic perspectives on the Africa–China relationship. Furthermore, the study shows that the themes discussed have not offered new perspectives but instead the discussions have repackaged old narratives as part of agenda building efforts by the protagonists. The study, therefore argues that social media have become important platforms for activation of issues on the Africa–China relationship, hence the persistence of these old narratives is attributed to lack of effective responses to issues on social media by both African countries and Chinese officials.
社交媒体上的中国殖民非洲叙事:一个议题激活与回应的视角
在2018年中非合作论坛会议前后,“中国殖民非洲”问题在传统媒体和社交媒体上都受到了广泛关注。本研究追踪了YouTube上的这些话语,YouTube是一个广泛用于提高意识和影响各种问题的公众舆论的社交媒体平台之一。主题和内容分析用于确定所选视频中讨论的主要主题,也用于确定观众在评论中表达的情绪。问题激活和响应模型用于从数据中创建意义。研究发现,主题和情绪反映出对非中关系的悲观和乐观观点占主导地位。此外,研究表明,讨论的主题并没有提供新的视角,而是将旧的叙述重新包装,作为主角议程建设努力的一部分。因此,该研究认为,社交媒体已成为激活非中关系问题的重要平台,因此,这些旧叙述的持续存在可归因于非洲国家和中国官员在社交媒体上缺乏对问题的有效回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信