Practical wisdom in health and social care: teaching for professional phronesis

Derek Sellman PhD, MA, BSc(Hons), RGN, RMN
{"title":"Practical wisdom in health and social care: teaching for professional phronesis","authors":"Derek Sellman PhD, MA, BSc(Hons), RGN, RMN","doi":"10.1111/j.1473-6861.2009.00222.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of teaching ethics to nurses and other health and social care practitioners is not always clear. At the extremes of the continuum of aims sit (i) the teaching of ethics as a subject just like any other subject; and (ii) the teaching of ethics as a form of moral education. In this article, I outline the pedagogic tension this uncertainty creates before offering some insights into the educational implications of teaching ethics from the perspective of the ethics of Aristotle. In this conception, ethics is the pursuit of character development and specifically the development of practical wisdom, or what I have termed <i>professional phronesis</i>. I argue that while learning to approximate practical wisdom for nursing is possible, from the perspective of the ethics of Aristotle it is problematic for higher education. An Aristotelian approach has the potential to undermine the demarcation of teacher role as this is usually understood in higher education at the present time because, as I suggest, the best teachers of <i>professional phronesis</i> may turn out to be those practitioners (including practitioners of teaching) who exemplify the <i>professional phronimos</i> (or professionally wise practitioner).</p>","PeriodicalId":100874,"journal":{"name":"Learning in Health and Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2009.00222.x","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning in Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2009.00222.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

The purpose of teaching ethics to nurses and other health and social care practitioners is not always clear. At the extremes of the continuum of aims sit (i) the teaching of ethics as a subject just like any other subject; and (ii) the teaching of ethics as a form of moral education. In this article, I outline the pedagogic tension this uncertainty creates before offering some insights into the educational implications of teaching ethics from the perspective of the ethics of Aristotle. In this conception, ethics is the pursuit of character development and specifically the development of practical wisdom, or what I have termed professional phronesis. I argue that while learning to approximate practical wisdom for nursing is possible, from the perspective of the ethics of Aristotle it is problematic for higher education. An Aristotelian approach has the potential to undermine the demarcation of teacher role as this is usually understood in higher education at the present time because, as I suggest, the best teachers of professional phronesis may turn out to be those practitioners (including practitioners of teaching) who exemplify the professional phronimos (or professionally wise practitioner).

卫生和社会保健中的实用智慧:专业实践教学
向护士和其他卫生和社会护理从业人员教授道德的目的并不总是明确的。在这一系列目的的两个极端是(1)把伦理学作为一门学科来教授,就像教授其他学科一样;(二)伦理教学作为道德教育的一种形式。在本文中,我概述了这种不确定性造成的教学紧张,然后从亚里士多德伦理学的角度对教学伦理学的教育含义提供了一些见解。在这个概念中,伦理是对性格发展的追求,特别是对实践智慧的发展,或者我所说的专业实践。我认为,虽然学习护理的实用智慧是可能的,但从亚里士多德伦理学的角度来看,高等教育存在问题。亚里士多德的方法有可能破坏教师角色的界限,因为这是目前高等教育中通常理解的,因为正如我所建议的那样,最好的专业phronesis教师可能是那些专业phronimos(或专业明智的从业者)的实践者(包括教学实践者)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信