iScotland: building a unified model of activism in multi-platform communication environments from traditional PR theory

A. Diers-Lawson
{"title":"iScotland: building a unified model of activism in multi-platform communication environments from traditional PR theory","authors":"A. Diers-Lawson","doi":"10.1108/ccij-12-2022-0153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn recent years, there has been a growth in research aimed at understanding the foundations of modern activist communication in media-rich and multi-platform environments. For example, Chon and Park's analysis of the American Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement built on Kim and Grunig's STOPS model. Yet, social and political injustice can exist for extended periods of time without successful movements emerging, so what leads people to demand social and political change through activism? This paper posits that crisis is trigger that motivates people to activism and evaluates that within the context of the Scottish independence movement.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on in-depth interviews with 26 advocates for Scottish independence, which yielded more than 32 h of data. Data were analysed using Strauss and Corbin's (1990) constant comparative method approach using open coding, axial coding and selective coding finding thematic saturation after only 10 interviews.FindingsThe study provides a clear extension of Chon and Park's model of activism by finding that crises are critical triggers for activism. Moreover, these findings also provide insights into not only the Scottish independence movement but more broadly the extension of traditional public relations and communication theory in multi-platform and multi-actor environments.Originality/valueThere are several contributions this piece makes. First, this paper extends activist, crisis and strategic communication research to more systematically consider the role that crisis plays in social and political advocacy. Second, this paper affords the opportunity to consider the challenges of communication, democracy and activism in the social media age. Finally, this paper supports an international view that discrimination and affective injustice experiences cut across many different kinds of identities and experiences instead of the traditionally considered ethnic, religious and gender-based experiences traditionally addressed.","PeriodicalId":10696,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Communications: An International Journal","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Communications: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-12-2022-0153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeIn recent years, there has been a growth in research aimed at understanding the foundations of modern activist communication in media-rich and multi-platform environments. For example, Chon and Park's analysis of the American Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement built on Kim and Grunig's STOPS model. Yet, social and political injustice can exist for extended periods of time without successful movements emerging, so what leads people to demand social and political change through activism? This paper posits that crisis is trigger that motivates people to activism and evaluates that within the context of the Scottish independence movement.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on in-depth interviews with 26 advocates for Scottish independence, which yielded more than 32 h of data. Data were analysed using Strauss and Corbin's (1990) constant comparative method approach using open coding, axial coding and selective coding finding thematic saturation after only 10 interviews.FindingsThe study provides a clear extension of Chon and Park's model of activism by finding that crises are critical triggers for activism. Moreover, these findings also provide insights into not only the Scottish independence movement but more broadly the extension of traditional public relations and communication theory in multi-platform and multi-actor environments.Originality/valueThere are several contributions this piece makes. First, this paper extends activist, crisis and strategic communication research to more systematically consider the role that crisis plays in social and political advocacy. Second, this paper affords the opportunity to consider the challenges of communication, democracy and activism in the social media age. Finally, this paper supports an international view that discrimination and affective injustice experiences cut across many different kinds of identities and experiences instead of the traditionally considered ethnic, religious and gender-based experiences traditionally addressed.
苏格兰:从传统公关理论出发,构建多平台传播环境下的统一行动主义模式
近年来,在媒体丰富和多平台环境下,旨在理解现代激进主义传播基础的研究有所增长。例如,Chon和Park对美国黑人的生命也很重要(BLM)运动的分析建立在Kim和Grunig的STOPS模型之上。然而,如果没有成功的运动出现,社会和政治不公可能会长期存在,那么是什么导致人们通过行动主义要求社会和政治变革呢?本文假设危机是激发人们行动主义的触发器,并在苏格兰独立运动的背景下对其进行评估。设计/方法/方法该研究基于对26名苏格兰独立倡导者的深度访谈,获得了超过32小时的数据。数据分析采用Strauss和Corbin(1990)的恒定比较方法,使用开放编码、轴向编码和选择性编码,仅在10次访谈后就发现主题饱和。该研究通过发现危机是行动主义的关键触发因素,为Chon和Park的行动主义模型提供了明确的扩展。此外,这些发现不仅为苏格兰独立运动提供了见解,而且更广泛地扩展了传统公共关系和传播理论在多平台和多参与者环境中的应用。原创性/价值这件作品有几个贡献。首先,本文扩展了行动者、危机和战略传播的研究,更系统地考虑危机在社会和政治倡导中的作用。其次,本文提供了考虑社交媒体时代传播、民主和行动主义的挑战的机会。最后,本文支持一种国际观点,即歧视和情感不公正经历跨越了许多不同类型的身份和经历,而不是传统上认为的种族、宗教和基于性别的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信