Patron-client relations in the system of public authorities of Russia

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
S. V. Vedyashkin, E. A. Glukhov
{"title":"Patron-client relations in the system of public authorities of Russia","authors":"S. V. Vedyashkin, E. A. Glukhov","doi":"10.17223/22253513/47/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Russian legal system, the phenomenon of favoritism in the public service system is given extremely little attention. In legal science, there is an opinion about the illegality of this phenomenon and its negative impact on society and the state. Without denying this statement, the author, nevertheless, tried to consider it from different sides and to identify, in addition to the negative, also the positive qualities of favoritism. Only some cases of favoritism in cases of granting property benefits are covered by corruption relations; in other cases, it falls out of legislative prohibitions and restrictions. It is very difficult to prove the identification of non-formal relations between the manager and his protege, the influence of deviation from formal rules on the effectiveness of management as a whole. The objectives of the study were to analyze the positive and negative aspects of management in the system of patron-client relations among the management level of employees of public management bodies. The author presents standard forms of influence on subordinates in order to release their positions for people close to the new head, suggests directions for improving the legislation on the conduct of state and municipal service. When preparing the article, the methods of formal logic were used-comparison, description, classification, analysis, synthesis, etc., which allowed us to characterize the existing system of appointment to positions of state employees. Among the private scientific methods, the formal-legal method used in the analysis of the power positions of officials was used; the logical-legal method, through which the content of legal norms in relation to the problem under consideration was investigated; specifically, the sociological method used in the analysis of statistical data related to the problems of the study. In conclusion, the author draws conclusions about the effectiveness of the activity of the authority in the presence of the head's favorites, suggests ways to improve the legislation regarding the legal relations under consideration.","PeriodicalId":41435,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/47/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Russian legal system, the phenomenon of favoritism in the public service system is given extremely little attention. In legal science, there is an opinion about the illegality of this phenomenon and its negative impact on society and the state. Without denying this statement, the author, nevertheless, tried to consider it from different sides and to identify, in addition to the negative, also the positive qualities of favoritism. Only some cases of favoritism in cases of granting property benefits are covered by corruption relations; in other cases, it falls out of legislative prohibitions and restrictions. It is very difficult to prove the identification of non-formal relations between the manager and his protege, the influence of deviation from formal rules on the effectiveness of management as a whole. The objectives of the study were to analyze the positive and negative aspects of management in the system of patron-client relations among the management level of employees of public management bodies. The author presents standard forms of influence on subordinates in order to release their positions for people close to the new head, suggests directions for improving the legislation on the conduct of state and municipal service. When preparing the article, the methods of formal logic were used-comparison, description, classification, analysis, synthesis, etc., which allowed us to characterize the existing system of appointment to positions of state employees. Among the private scientific methods, the formal-legal method used in the analysis of the power positions of officials was used; the logical-legal method, through which the content of legal norms in relation to the problem under consideration was investigated; specifically, the sociological method used in the analysis of statistical data related to the problems of the study. In conclusion, the author draws conclusions about the effectiveness of the activity of the authority in the presence of the head's favorites, suggests ways to improve the legislation regarding the legal relations under consideration.
论俄罗斯公共权力体制中的主顾关系
在俄罗斯的法律体系中,公共服务系统中的偏袒现象很少受到重视。法学界对这一现象的非法性及其对社会和国家的负面影响有不同的看法。然而,作者在不否认这一说法的情况下,试图从不同的方面来考虑这一问题,并指出,除了消极的一面之外,偏袒也有积极的一面。只有在给予财产利益的案件中存在某些偏袒的情况才属于腐败关系;在其他情况下,它不受法律禁止和限制。很难证明管理者和他的门徒之间的非正式关系的识别,偏离正式规则对整体管理有效性的影响。这项研究的目的是分析公共管理机构雇员的管理阶层在赞助人-客户关系系统中管理的积极和消极方面。提交人提出了对下属施加影响的标准形式,以便将其职位让与新领导人关系密切的人,并提出了改进国家和市政服务行为立法的方向。在撰写文章时,我们运用了形式逻辑的方法——比较、描述、分类、分析、综合等,从而对现有的国家公务员任用制度进行了表征。在民间的科学方法中,运用了分析官员权力地位的形式法律方法;逻辑-法律方法,通过这种方法调查与所审议的问题有关的法律规范的内容;具体来说,就是运用社会学的方法对统计数据的相关问题进行分析研究。最后,作者对当局在首领亲信存在时的活动有效性作出了结论,并就所考虑的法律关系提出了完善立法的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信