Intravenous methylprednisolone pulses in hospitalised patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

C. Salvarani, M. Massari, M. Costantini, D. Merlo, Gabriella Lucia Mariani, Pierluigi Viale, S. Nava, G. Guaraldi, G. Dolci, L. Boni, L. Savoldi, P. Bruzzi, Caterina Turrà, M. Catanoso, A. Marata, Chiara Barbieri, Annamaria Valcavi, Francesca Franzoni, S. Cavuto, G. Mazzi, R. Corsini, F. Trapani, A. Bartoloni, E. Barisione, Chiara Barbieri, G. Burastero, A. Pan, W. Inojosa, R. Scala, C. Burattini, F. Luppi, M. Codeluppi, Kamal Eldin Tarek, G. Cenderello, M. Salio, G. Foti, R. Dongilli, G. Bajocchi, E. Negri, G. Ciusa, Giacomo Fornaro, I. Bassi, L. Zammarchi, T. Aloè, N. Facciolongo
{"title":"Intravenous methylprednisolone pulses in hospitalised patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial","authors":"C. Salvarani, M. Massari, M. Costantini, D. Merlo, Gabriella Lucia Mariani, Pierluigi Viale, S. Nava, G. Guaraldi, G. Dolci, L. Boni, L. Savoldi, P. Bruzzi, Caterina Turrà, M. Catanoso, A. Marata, Chiara Barbieri, Annamaria Valcavi, Francesca Franzoni, S. Cavuto, G. Mazzi, R. Corsini, F. Trapani, A. Bartoloni, E. Barisione, Chiara Barbieri, G. Burastero, A. Pan, W. Inojosa, R. Scala, C. Burattini, F. Luppi, M. Codeluppi, Kamal Eldin Tarek, G. Cenderello, M. Salio, G. Foti, R. Dongilli, G. Bajocchi, E. Negri, G. Ciusa, Giacomo Fornaro, I. Bassi, L. Zammarchi, T. Aloè, N. Facciolongo","doi":"10.1183/13993003.00025-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale Pulse glucocorticoid therapy is used in hyperinflammation related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of pulse intravenous methylprednisolone in addition to standard treatment in COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 304 hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were randomised to receive 1 g of methylprednisolone intravenously for three consecutive days or placebo in addition to standard dexamethasone. The primary outcome was the duration of patient hospitalisation, calculated as the time interval between randomisation and hospital discharge without the need for supplementary oxygen. The key secondary outcomes were survival free from invasive ventilation with orotracheal intubation and overall survival. Results Overall, 112 (75.4%) out of 151 patients in the pulse methylprednisolone arm and 111 (75.2%) of 150 in the placebo arm were discharged from hospital without oxygen within 30 days from randomisation. Median time to discharge was similar in both groups (15 days, 95% CI 13.0–17.0 days and 16 days, 95% CI 13.8–18.2 days, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% CI 0.71–1.20; p=0.528). No significant differences between pulse methylprednisolone and placebo arms were observed in terms of admission to intensive care unit with orotracheal intubation or death (20.0% versus 16.1%; HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.74–2.16; p=0.176) or overall mortality (10.0% versus 12.2%; HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.42–1.64; p=0.584). Serious adverse events occurred with similar frequency in the two groups. Conclusions Methylprenisolone pulse therapy added to dexamethasone was not of benefit in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The quick and strong anti-inflammatory effect of pulse glucocorticoid therapy seems to be of no benefit in COVID-19 pneumonia https://bit.ly/3IkUmSn","PeriodicalId":77419,"journal":{"name":"The European respiratory journal. Supplement","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European respiratory journal. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00025-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Rationale Pulse glucocorticoid therapy is used in hyperinflammation related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of pulse intravenous methylprednisolone in addition to standard treatment in COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 304 hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were randomised to receive 1 g of methylprednisolone intravenously for three consecutive days or placebo in addition to standard dexamethasone. The primary outcome was the duration of patient hospitalisation, calculated as the time interval between randomisation and hospital discharge without the need for supplementary oxygen. The key secondary outcomes were survival free from invasive ventilation with orotracheal intubation and overall survival. Results Overall, 112 (75.4%) out of 151 patients in the pulse methylprednisolone arm and 111 (75.2%) of 150 in the placebo arm were discharged from hospital without oxygen within 30 days from randomisation. Median time to discharge was similar in both groups (15 days, 95% CI 13.0–17.0 days and 16 days, 95% CI 13.8–18.2 days, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% CI 0.71–1.20; p=0.528). No significant differences between pulse methylprednisolone and placebo arms were observed in terms of admission to intensive care unit with orotracheal intubation or death (20.0% versus 16.1%; HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.74–2.16; p=0.176) or overall mortality (10.0% versus 12.2%; HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.42–1.64; p=0.584). Serious adverse events occurred with similar frequency in the two groups. Conclusions Methylprenisolone pulse therapy added to dexamethasone was not of benefit in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The quick and strong anti-inflammatory effect of pulse glucocorticoid therapy seems to be of no benefit in COVID-19 pneumonia https://bit.ly/3IkUmSn
重症COVID-19肺炎住院患者静脉注射甲基强的松龙脉冲:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验
脉冲糖皮质激素疗法用于治疗与2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的高炎症。我们评估了在标准治疗的基础上脉冲静脉注射甲基强的松龙治疗COVID-19肺炎的疗效和安全性。方法在这项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,304例住院的COVID-19肺炎患者随机分为两组,分别接受1 g甲基强的松龙静脉注射,连续3天,或在标准地塞米松的基础上服用安慰剂。主要结局是患者住院时间,计算为随机化和出院之间不需要补充氧气的时间间隔。主要的次要结果是无创通气和气管插管的生存和总生存。总体而言,在随机分组后的30天内,脉冲甲基强的松龙组的151名患者中有112名(75.4%)和安慰剂组的150名患者中有111名(75.2%)无氧出院。两组的中位出院时间相似(15天,95% CI分别为13.0 ~ 17.0天和16天,95% CI分别为13.8 ~ 18.2天;风险比(HR) 0.92, 95% CI 0.71 ~ 1.20;p = 0.528)。在经气管插管进入重症监护病房或死亡方面,脉冲甲基强的松龙组和安慰剂组无显著差异(20.0% vs 16.1%;Hr 1.26, 95% ci 0.74-2.16;P =0.176)或总死亡率(10.0% vs 12.2%;Hr 0.83, 95% ci 0.42-1.64;p = 0.584)。两组患者发生严重不良事件的频率相似。结论甲泼尼龙联合地塞米松脉冲治疗对新冠肺炎患者无明显疗效。脉冲糖皮质激素治疗的快速而强的抗炎作用似乎对COVID-19肺炎没有益处https://bit.ly/3IkUmSn
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信