Focalizzazione e deissi: una possibile funzione dell’aumento omerico

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Edoardo Chiattelli
{"title":"Focalizzazione e deissi: una possibile funzione dell’aumento omerico","authors":"Edoardo Chiattelli","doi":"10.13109/GLOT.2019.95.1.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Bakker, the Homeric augment was a morpheme of proximal deixis. This theory can be confirmed in two contexts: similes, where the coexistence of present indicatives and augmented aorists can be explained only by considering the category of aspect, not the one of tense; and contexts involving the adjective νήπιος, which are here explained not only from a narrative viewpoint, but also by considering the major presence of augmented forms in them. The PIE augment seems to have been a deictic particle not compatible with present tense and it might have been initially used only with aorists and later extended to imperfects, as foregrounding is strongly related to perfectivity.","PeriodicalId":43767,"journal":{"name":"GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/GLOT.2019.95.1.26","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to Bakker, the Homeric augment was a morpheme of proximal deixis. This theory can be confirmed in two contexts: similes, where the coexistence of present indicatives and augmented aorists can be explained only by considering the category of aspect, not the one of tense; and contexts involving the adjective νήπιος, which are here explained not only from a narrative viewpoint, but also by considering the major presence of augmented forms in them. The PIE augment seems to have been a deictic particle not compatible with present tense and it might have been initially used only with aorists and later extended to imperfects, as foregrounding is strongly related to perfectivity.
聚焦和深度:可能的椭圆增量函数
根据巴克的说法,荷马语的增词是近端指示语的语素。这一理论可以在两种情况下得到证实:明喻,在明喻中,现在指示和增广指示的共存只能通过考虑方面的范畴来解释,而不是时态的范畴;以及涉及形容词ν πιος的上下文,在这里不仅从叙述的角度解释,而且考虑到其中主要存在的增广形式。PIE增词似乎是一个指示语词,与现在时不兼容,它最初可能只用于描述完美,后来扩展到描述不完美,因为前景与完美密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift erscheint seit 1909 in zwangloser Folge. Vor allem sprachgeschichtliche, strukturelle und etymologische Untersuchungen werden publiziert; Beiträge in deutscher oder englischer Sprache.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信