The use of chironomid pupal exuviae in river biomonitoring : the importance of sampling strategy

J. Raunio, T. Muotka
{"title":"The use of chironomid pupal exuviae in river biomonitoring : the importance of sampling strategy","authors":"J. Raunio, T. Muotka","doi":"10.1127/0003-9136/2005/0164-0529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the seasonal variation in the emergence patterns of chironomid taxa, a combination of three monthly samples from spring to autumn has been recommended for biomonitoring of rivers using the Chironomid Pupal Exuvial Technique (CPET). The main purposes of this study were to establish an effective sampling strategy (i. e. strategy that would allow effective discrimination between study sites) for biomonitoring of boreal rivers using the CPET methodology and to estimate the taxonomic coverage of any three monthly sample combinations. First, we collected pupal exuvial samples from three oligo- to mesotrophic study sites in a large boreal River Kymi, southern Finland, in 4-week intervals from the beginning of May to September 2003. The four most effective combinations of three monthly samples resulted in a significant difference between the sites, while the six least powerful combinations indicated no differences in chironomid communities between the sites. A corresponding data set was collected from four oligo- to eutrophic rivers, one sampling site representing each river. In this data set, eight combinations out of ten found significant differences between the rivers. Thus, the sampling strategy seemed more decisive at the within vs. among-river scale of comparison. No single combination of three monthly samples was consistently the most effective one in discriminating among the studied sites and rivers. Nevertheless, a combination of CPET samples from different seasons (i. e. spring, mid-summer and late summer/autumn) clearly constitutes the best sampling strategy for the detection of environmental impacts in boreal rivers. In the studied rivers, and probably in other boreal rivers as well, any combination of three monthly samples from spring to autumn will yield a reasonably high coverage of the available genera (at least 60%). We suggest that the efficiency of different sample combinations and the distribution of the emergence periods of locally abundant intolerant taxa are crucial information when the CPET methodology is used for river biomonitoring.","PeriodicalId":8118,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2005/0164-0529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Due to the seasonal variation in the emergence patterns of chironomid taxa, a combination of three monthly samples from spring to autumn has been recommended for biomonitoring of rivers using the Chironomid Pupal Exuvial Technique (CPET). The main purposes of this study were to establish an effective sampling strategy (i. e. strategy that would allow effective discrimination between study sites) for biomonitoring of boreal rivers using the CPET methodology and to estimate the taxonomic coverage of any three monthly sample combinations. First, we collected pupal exuvial samples from three oligo- to mesotrophic study sites in a large boreal River Kymi, southern Finland, in 4-week intervals from the beginning of May to September 2003. The four most effective combinations of three monthly samples resulted in a significant difference between the sites, while the six least powerful combinations indicated no differences in chironomid communities between the sites. A corresponding data set was collected from four oligo- to eutrophic rivers, one sampling site representing each river. In this data set, eight combinations out of ten found significant differences between the rivers. Thus, the sampling strategy seemed more decisive at the within vs. among-river scale of comparison. No single combination of three monthly samples was consistently the most effective one in discriminating among the studied sites and rivers. Nevertheless, a combination of CPET samples from different seasons (i. e. spring, mid-summer and late summer/autumn) clearly constitutes the best sampling strategy for the detection of environmental impacts in boreal rivers. In the studied rivers, and probably in other boreal rivers as well, any combination of three monthly samples from spring to autumn will yield a reasonably high coverage of the available genera (at least 60%). We suggest that the efficiency of different sample combinations and the distribution of the emergence periods of locally abundant intolerant taxa are crucial information when the CPET methodology is used for river biomonitoring.
蝶蛹蜕卵在河流生物监测中的应用:取样策略的重要性
鉴于手摇蝇种群出现模式的季节性变化,建议采用春、秋三个月取样的方法对河流进行手摇蝇蛹蜕卵技术(CPET)监测。本研究的主要目的是建立一种有效的采样策略(即允许在研究地点之间进行有效区分的策略),用于使用CPET方法对北方河流进行生物监测,并估计任意三个月样本组合的分类覆盖率。首先,从2003年5月初到9月,我们在芬兰南部一条北方大河Kymi的三个寡营养到中营养研究点收集了蛹的粪便样本,每隔4周采集一次。3个月取样的4个最有效组合在不同地点间产生显著差异,而6个最不有效组合在不同地点间无差异。从四条低至富营养化河流中收集相应的数据集,每条河流一个采样点。在这个数据集中,十种组合中有八种发现了河流之间的显著差异。因此,采样策略在河内与河间的比较尺度上似乎更具决定性。三个月样本的单一组合在区分研究地点和河流方面没有一致的最有效的组合。然而,来自不同季节(即春季、仲夏和夏末/秋季)的CPET样品的组合显然构成了检测北方河流环境影响的最佳采样策略。在研究的河流中,可能在其他北方河流中也是如此,从春季到秋季三个月取样的任何组合都将产生相当高的可用属覆盖率(至少60%)。我们认为,不同样品组合的效率和局部丰富的不耐性类群的出现期分布是CPET方法用于河流生物监测时的重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信