Towards an efficient methodology for evaluation of quality of experience in Augmented Reality

Jordi Puig, A. Perkis, F. Lindseth, T. Ebrahimi
{"title":"Towards an efficient methodology for evaluation of quality of experience in Augmented Reality","authors":"Jordi Puig, A. Perkis, F. Lindseth, T. Ebrahimi","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to survey existing quality assessment methodologies for Augmented Reality (AR) visualization and to introduce a methodology for subjective quality assessment. Methodologies to assess the quality of AR systems have existed since these technologies appeared. The existing methodologies typically take an approach from the fields they are used in, such as ergonomics, usability, psychophysics or ethnography. Each field utilizes different methods, looking at different aspects of AR quality such as physical limitations, tracking loss or jitter, perceptual issues or feedback issues, just to name a few. AR systems are complex experiences, involving a mix of user interaction, visual perception, audio, haptic or other types of multimodal interactions as well. This paper focuses on the quality assessment of AR visualization, with a special interest on applications for neuronavigation.","PeriodicalId":6303,"journal":{"name":"2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience","volume":"25 1","pages":"188-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to survey existing quality assessment methodologies for Augmented Reality (AR) visualization and to introduce a methodology for subjective quality assessment. Methodologies to assess the quality of AR systems have existed since these technologies appeared. The existing methodologies typically take an approach from the fields they are used in, such as ergonomics, usability, psychophysics or ethnography. Each field utilizes different methods, looking at different aspects of AR quality such as physical limitations, tracking loss or jitter, perceptual issues or feedback issues, just to name a few. AR systems are complex experiences, involving a mix of user interaction, visual perception, audio, haptic or other types of multimodal interactions as well. This paper focuses on the quality assessment of AR visualization, with a special interest on applications for neuronavigation.
探索一种有效的增强现实体验质量评估方法
本文的目的是调查现有的增强现实(AR)可视化质量评估方法,并介绍一种主观质量评估方法。自这些技术出现以来,就存在评估AR系统质量的方法。现有的方法通常采用他们所使用的领域的方法,如人体工程学、可用性、心理物理学或人种学。每个领域使用不同的方法,着眼于AR质量的不同方面,如物理限制,跟踪损失或抖动,感知问题或反馈问题,仅举几例。AR系统是一种复杂的体验,涉及用户交互、视觉感知、音频、触觉或其他类型的多模态交互。本文的重点是AR可视化的质量评估,特别关注神经导航的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信