Promotion through claiming centrality in L1 and L2 English Research Article Introductions

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
J. Abdi, Karim Sadeghi
{"title":"Promotion through claiming centrality in L1 and L2 English Research Article Introductions","authors":"J. Abdi, Karim Sadeghi","doi":"10.6018/IJES/2018/1/297381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marketization in all public spheres including academic discourse has led to the increased importance of promotion. One of the promotional tools usually used in Research Articles Introductions (RAIs) is claiming centrality which can be realized through different linguistic and textual resources. In this study, our aim was to explore differences between native and non-native writers in the use of strategies for claiming centrality in RAIs. To this end, a corpus of 50 RAIs (25 L1 and 25 L2 which were written by native English and non-native Iranian writers, respectively) was compiled and analyzed in terms of the strategies used for claiming centrality introduced by Wang and Yang (2015). The introductions were read through closely and the types and orientations of the strategies were identified. Then, the two sub-corpora were compared to highlight differences and/or similarities. The results showed that the mean occurrence of centrality claims in general is nearly the same in both groups of texts while in terms of the specific strategies employed to make such claims there are some differences between them. The findings of this study can serve EAP/ESP practitioners and learners as well as those wishing to publish their research internationally by raising their awareness in this regard and helping them report their research findings more convincingly.","PeriodicalId":44450,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6018/IJES/2018/1/297381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Marketization in all public spheres including academic discourse has led to the increased importance of promotion. One of the promotional tools usually used in Research Articles Introductions (RAIs) is claiming centrality which can be realized through different linguistic and textual resources. In this study, our aim was to explore differences between native and non-native writers in the use of strategies for claiming centrality in RAIs. To this end, a corpus of 50 RAIs (25 L1 and 25 L2 which were written by native English and non-native Iranian writers, respectively) was compiled and analyzed in terms of the strategies used for claiming centrality introduced by Wang and Yang (2015). The introductions were read through closely and the types and orientations of the strategies were identified. Then, the two sub-corpora were compared to highlight differences and/or similarities. The results showed that the mean occurrence of centrality claims in general is nearly the same in both groups of texts while in terms of the specific strategies employed to make such claims there are some differences between them. The findings of this study can serve EAP/ESP practitioners and learners as well as those wishing to publish their research internationally by raising their awareness in this regard and helping them report their research findings more convincingly.
通过声称在L1和L2英语中的中心地位来提升
包括学术话语在内的所有公共领域的市场化使得推广的重要性日益增加。在研究文章介绍(RAIs)中,通常使用的一种宣传工具是声称中心性,这可以通过不同的语言和文本资源来实现。在这项研究中,我们的目的是探讨母语和非母语作者在使用rai中心性策略方面的差异。为此,根据Wang和Yang(2015)提出的声称中心性的策略,对50个rai(分别由英语母语作家和非伊朗母语作家撰写的25个L1和25个L2)的语料库进行了编译和分析。我们仔细阅读了介绍,并确定了策略的类型和方向。然后,比较两个子语料库,以突出差异和/或相似之处。结果表明,在两组文本中,中心性主张的平均发生率几乎相同,但在提出中心性主张的具体策略方面,它们之间存在一些差异。本研究的发现可以帮助EAP/ESP从业者和学习者,以及那些希望在国际上发表研究成果的人,提高他们在这方面的意识,帮助他们更有说服力地报告他们的研究成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of English Studies (IJES) is a double-blind peer review journal which seeks to reflect the newest research in the general field of English Studies: English Language and Linguistics, Applied English Linguistics, Literature in English and Cultural studies of English-speaking countries. We will give preference to keeping the balance amongst the areas and subareas belonging to English Studies whenever possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信