The effectiveness of argumentation based learning and problem based learning models in improving student’s argumentation skills about salt hydrolysis concept

Ani Puspita Sari, Harizon Harizon, Muhammad Haris Effendi-hasibuan
{"title":"The effectiveness of argumentation based learning and problem based learning models in improving student’s argumentation skills about salt hydrolysis concept","authors":"Ani Puspita Sari, Harizon Harizon, Muhammad Haris Effendi-hasibuan","doi":"10.24114/jpkim.v13i3.29928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning model that can train students in developing their argumentative skills includes the Argumentation Based Learning (ABL) and Problem Based Learning (PBL). This study aimed to see the effectiveness of the ABL and PBL models in improving students' argumentation skills about the concept of salt hydrolysis. The study was conducted in the class XI MIA SMAN 1 Tebo Jambi with a sample consisting of two classes. Some 50 students were recruited purposively to be the participants of this study. Concurrent embedded mix method using two group pretest posttest control group design was used in this study. The results of independent t-test showed that ABL was more effective than PBL (t= 4.864; p-value=0.00 < 0.05) in improving the students' argumentation skills. This was supported by the N-gain test of ABL which was 0.82 and the N -Gain test of PBL was 0.68. The results of observations revealed that the ABL students had more intensive opportunities to debate their argumentation than those in the PBL class. This was believed as the major factor influencing the difference in the students’ argumentation skills.","PeriodicalId":17697,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v13i3.29928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning model that can train students in developing their argumentative skills includes the Argumentation Based Learning (ABL) and Problem Based Learning (PBL). This study aimed to see the effectiveness of the ABL and PBL models in improving students' argumentation skills about the concept of salt hydrolysis. The study was conducted in the class XI MIA SMAN 1 Tebo Jambi with a sample consisting of two classes. Some 50 students were recruited purposively to be the participants of this study. Concurrent embedded mix method using two group pretest posttest control group design was used in this study. The results of independent t-test showed that ABL was more effective than PBL (t= 4.864; p-value=0.00 < 0.05) in improving the students' argumentation skills. This was supported by the N-gain test of ABL which was 0.82 and the N -Gain test of PBL was 0.68. The results of observations revealed that the ABL students had more intensive opportunities to debate their argumentation than those in the PBL class. This was believed as the major factor influencing the difference in the students’ argumentation skills.
基于论证的学习模式和基于问题的学习模式在提高学生关于盐水解概念的论证能力方面的有效性
能够培养学生议论文能力的学习模式包括基于论证的学习(ABL)和基于问题的学习(PBL)。本研究旨在观察ABL和PBL模型在提高学生对盐水解概念的论证能力方面的有效性。大约50名学生被有意招募为这项研究的参与者。本研究采用两组并行嵌入式混合法,采用前测后测对照组设计。独立t检验结果显示ABL比PBL更有效(t= 4.864;p值=0.00 < 0.05)。ABL的N-增益检验为0.82,PBL的N-增益检验为0.68。观察结果显示,ABL班的学生比PBL班的学生有更多的机会辩论他们的论点。这被认为是影响学生论证能力差异的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信