When Did John Smyth Embrace ‘Arminianism’ – and Was the First Baptist Congregation ‘Particular’?

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Stephen R. Holmes
{"title":"When Did John Smyth Embrace ‘Arminianism’ – and Was the First Baptist Congregation ‘Particular’?","authors":"Stephen R. Holmes","doi":"10.1080/0005576X.2021.1947651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Unsurprisingly given his schooling in Elizabethan Puritanism, John Smyth’s early works show that he held to standard Calvinistic positions on election, reprobation, and original sin. By 1610 he had clearly repudiated these positions. This essay explores when and why he changed his mind. Textual evidence shows that he was still holding Calvinistic convictions when he baptised himself and the others, and then formed the first Baptist church in (probably) 1609. The reason for his repudiation of Calvinism some months after that is less certain, but I argue that it was probably down to an engagement with the Waterlander Mennonites that came after the baptisms. I therefore argue that, contrary to common report, the first Baptist congregation was ‘Particular’, not ‘General’, although it quickly changed, and that the long-standing question of whether the Mennonites had a significant effect on early Baptist development can be answered in the affirmative.","PeriodicalId":39857,"journal":{"name":"The Baptist quarterly","volume":"39 1","pages":"146 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Baptist quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0005576X.2021.1947651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Unsurprisingly given his schooling in Elizabethan Puritanism, John Smyth’s early works show that he held to standard Calvinistic positions on election, reprobation, and original sin. By 1610 he had clearly repudiated these positions. This essay explores when and why he changed his mind. Textual evidence shows that he was still holding Calvinistic convictions when he baptised himself and the others, and then formed the first Baptist church in (probably) 1609. The reason for his repudiation of Calvinism some months after that is less certain, but I argue that it was probably down to an engagement with the Waterlander Mennonites that came after the baptisms. I therefore argue that, contrary to common report, the first Baptist congregation was ‘Particular’, not ‘General’, although it quickly changed, and that the long-standing question of whether the Mennonites had a significant effect on early Baptist development can be answered in the affirmative.
约翰·斯密什么时候接受了“阿米念主义”——第一浸信会是“特殊的”吗?
约翰·斯密的早期作品表明,他在拣选、谴责和原罪等问题上坚持加尔文主义的标准立场,这并不奇怪。到1610年,他明确否定了这些立场。这篇文章探讨了他改变主意的时间和原因。文本证据表明,当他为自己和其他人施洗时,他仍然持有加尔文主义的信念,然后在(可能)1609年成立了第一个浸信会教堂。几个月后,他抛弃加尔文主义的原因就不太确定了,但我认为,这可能是由于洗礼后与水乡门诺派教徒的接触。因此,我认为,与一般报道相反,第一个浸信会会众是“特殊的”,而不是“一般的”,尽管它很快就发生了变化,门诺派是否对早期浸信会的发展产生了重大影响这个长期存在的问题可以得到肯定的回答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Baptist quarterly
The Baptist quarterly Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信