J Reboul-Marty , P Thoreux , M Debien , J.L Roynard , M Durand , G Languillat
{"title":"L'évaluation de la satisfaction des patients des services d'urgences est-elle possible?","authors":"J Reboul-Marty , P Thoreux , M Debien , J.L Roynard , M Durand , G Languillat","doi":"10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90072-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to assess patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> French-speaking patients and volunteers that came to the emergency unit between 10:00 am and 12:00 pm were included in the study for a two-week period. In order to obtain reliable responses, the investigators interviewed the patients face to face with the assistance of a specific questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Fifty-two percent of the 514 interviewed patients agreed to answer the investigators' questions; the major reason for failure to reply was the lack of time. Using the Principal Components Analysis, the data were gathered into six dimensions: reception, waiting room 1, waiting room 2, staff appreciation, communication, and waiting time. Six scores of dissatisfaction were established, ranging from 0 (most satisfied) to 100 (most dissatisfied). The results showed that the most worrying point was the waiting (45 ± 22 min). The perception of the length of waiting time was statistically related (<em>P</em> < 0.0001) to the time spent in the emergency unit, contrary to its tolerance. The second point of dissatisfaction was the location (waiting room 1:30 ± 22; waiting room 2.31 ± 22). Finally, the most motivating point for the staff was the recognition of their work by the patients (28 ± 15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study found the reasons for the published dissatisfaction. Its intent was to quantify the degree of dissatisfaction and to treat the problems on a hierarchical basis, thus making it possible to better meet the patients' needs. The assessment of patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit is possible but implies a significant deployment of means to obtain a satisfying response rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101063,"journal":{"name":"Réanimation Urgences","volume":"9 5","pages":"Pages 331-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90072-0","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Réanimation Urgences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164675600900720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit.
Methods: French-speaking patients and volunteers that came to the emergency unit between 10:00 am and 12:00 pm were included in the study for a two-week period. In order to obtain reliable responses, the investigators interviewed the patients face to face with the assistance of a specific questionnaire.
Results: Fifty-two percent of the 514 interviewed patients agreed to answer the investigators' questions; the major reason for failure to reply was the lack of time. Using the Principal Components Analysis, the data were gathered into six dimensions: reception, waiting room 1, waiting room 2, staff appreciation, communication, and waiting time. Six scores of dissatisfaction were established, ranging from 0 (most satisfied) to 100 (most dissatisfied). The results showed that the most worrying point was the waiting (45 ± 22 min). The perception of the length of waiting time was statistically related (P < 0.0001) to the time spent in the emergency unit, contrary to its tolerance. The second point of dissatisfaction was the location (waiting room 1:30 ± 22; waiting room 2.31 ± 22). Finally, the most motivating point for the staff was the recognition of their work by the patients (28 ± 15).
Conclusion: This study found the reasons for the published dissatisfaction. Its intent was to quantify the degree of dissatisfaction and to treat the problems on a hierarchical basis, thus making it possible to better meet the patients' needs. The assessment of patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit is possible but implies a significant deployment of means to obtain a satisfying response rate.