Bipolar Disorder and Self-Determination: Predicating Self-Determination at Scope

IF 2.6 0 PHILOSOPHY
E. Porter
{"title":"Bipolar Disorder and Self-Determination: Predicating Self-Determination at Scope","authors":"E. Porter","doi":"10.1353/ppp.2022.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Bipolar or related disorders (BoRD) present unique practical and existential problems for people who live with them. All agents experience changes in the things they care about over time. However people living with BoRD face drastic shifts in what seems valuable to them, which upset their longitudinal values (if, indeed, any stable longitudinal values are available in the first place). Navigating these evaluative high seas presents agents living with BoRD with a distinctive existential question, not shared by those on calmer waters. I draw out two contrasting ways in which someone living with BoRD might seek to support their self-determination in these circumstances, by crafting appropriate self care and support regimes. The first strategy involves managing one’s affective episodes so that they do not interrupt one’s plans and long-term agency over time. The second involves a regimen that allows one the greatest degree of freedom in adapting to changes in one’s experiences of value. What distinguishes these sorts of self-determination is the scope at which they are predicated. Although both sorts of self-determination allow an individual to rule themselves, they alter the overall shape of one’s autonomy in quite different ways.","PeriodicalId":45397,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology","volume":"8 1","pages":"133 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2022.0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Bipolar or related disorders (BoRD) present unique practical and existential problems for people who live with them. All agents experience changes in the things they care about over time. However people living with BoRD face drastic shifts in what seems valuable to them, which upset their longitudinal values (if, indeed, any stable longitudinal values are available in the first place). Navigating these evaluative high seas presents agents living with BoRD with a distinctive existential question, not shared by those on calmer waters. I draw out two contrasting ways in which someone living with BoRD might seek to support their self-determination in these circumstances, by crafting appropriate self care and support regimes. The first strategy involves managing one’s affective episodes so that they do not interrupt one’s plans and long-term agency over time. The second involves a regimen that allows one the greatest degree of freedom in adapting to changes in one’s experiences of value. What distinguishes these sorts of self-determination is the scope at which they are predicated. Although both sorts of self-determination allow an individual to rule themselves, they alter the overall shape of one’s autonomy in quite different ways.
双相情感障碍和自我决定:在范围内预测自我决定
摘要:双相或相关障碍(BoRD)给患者带来了独特的现实和存在问题。随着时间的推移,所有的代理都会经历他们所关心的事情的变化。然而,患有BoRD的人在他们看来有价值的东西上面临着巨大的变化,这扰乱了他们的纵向价值(如果确实存在任何稳定的纵向价值的话)。在这些评估性强的公海上航行,给生活在BoRD的特工们带来了一个独特的生存问题,而那些生活在平静水域的特工们却没有这样的问题。我提出了两种截然不同的方式,在这种情况下,患有BoRD的人可能会通过制定适当的自我照顾和支持制度来寻求支持他们的自决。第一种策略涉及管理一个人的情感事件,这样它们就不会随着时间的推移打断一个人的计划和长期代理。第二种是一种养生法,它允许一个人最大程度地自由适应个人价值体验的变化。区分这类自决的是它们被断言的范围。尽管两种类型的自决都允许个人统治自己,但它们以完全不同的方式改变了一个人自治的整体形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信