Old Wheelways: Traces of Bicycle History on the Land by Robert L. McCullough (review)

Pub Date : 2017-11-27 DOI:10.5860/choice.195566
Evan Friss
{"title":"Old Wheelways: Traces of Bicycle History on the Land by Robert L. McCullough (review)","authors":"Evan Friss","doi":"10.5860/choice.195566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"separated the city by race and class, which seems obviously true, goes unelaborated, a shortcoming that mars other chapters as well. In the last chapter, “Clearing the Lungs of the City,” McNeur discusses the usual suspects associated with this story, including Frederick Law Olmsted and Charles Loring Brace, the founder of the Children’s Aid Society, who argued that the creation of Central Park would benefit poor laborers. To this more familiar narrative of Central Park, McNeur adds the life and work of ragpickers, a “large system of entrepreneurs who acted as middlemen” for a network of junk shops and second-hand stores, together forming “a crucial link in the urban recycling network” (190). In an Epilogue, McNeur concludes her investigation with the Draft Riots of 1863 and a look at New York State’s Metropolitan Health Act of 1866, which opened the door to much stricter regulation of waste. One limitation of Taming Manhattan for readers steeped in nineteenth-century urban or social history is McNeur’s heavy reliance on previous scholarship, especially when discussing class—although she does make use of copious new primary sources, tracking a street-trees ordinance through multiple committees in 1833, for example, and crosschecking the names of those arrested in the Draft Riots with her own database of squatters and piggery owners. A larger problem is weak cultural analysis. Too often she relies on stock assertions about battles for control over urban spaces—and the racial and class implications of those battles—without offering fresh insights into how they manifested themselves on the landscape. More generally, while McNeur is to be commended for restoring waste-centered businesses that poor residents created and relied on to the history of the antebellum city, she devotes too little attention to the question of how these activities change the way we understand the history of that urbanizing landscape. Nonetheless, the work is lucid and jargon-free, with occasional flashes of vivid, even suspenseful, writing and evocative scene-setting. Taming Manhattan will be prized as a concise and incisive compendium of battles over urban space in one nineteenth-century city as seen through the lens of municipal legislation.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.195566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

separated the city by race and class, which seems obviously true, goes unelaborated, a shortcoming that mars other chapters as well. In the last chapter, “Clearing the Lungs of the City,” McNeur discusses the usual suspects associated with this story, including Frederick Law Olmsted and Charles Loring Brace, the founder of the Children’s Aid Society, who argued that the creation of Central Park would benefit poor laborers. To this more familiar narrative of Central Park, McNeur adds the life and work of ragpickers, a “large system of entrepreneurs who acted as middlemen” for a network of junk shops and second-hand stores, together forming “a crucial link in the urban recycling network” (190). In an Epilogue, McNeur concludes her investigation with the Draft Riots of 1863 and a look at New York State’s Metropolitan Health Act of 1866, which opened the door to much stricter regulation of waste. One limitation of Taming Manhattan for readers steeped in nineteenth-century urban or social history is McNeur’s heavy reliance on previous scholarship, especially when discussing class—although she does make use of copious new primary sources, tracking a street-trees ordinance through multiple committees in 1833, for example, and crosschecking the names of those arrested in the Draft Riots with her own database of squatters and piggery owners. A larger problem is weak cultural analysis. Too often she relies on stock assertions about battles for control over urban spaces—and the racial and class implications of those battles—without offering fresh insights into how they manifested themselves on the landscape. More generally, while McNeur is to be commended for restoring waste-centered businesses that poor residents created and relied on to the history of the antebellum city, she devotes too little attention to the question of how these activities change the way we understand the history of that urbanizing landscape. Nonetheless, the work is lucid and jargon-free, with occasional flashes of vivid, even suspenseful, writing and evocative scene-setting. Taming Manhattan will be prized as a concise and incisive compendium of battles over urban space in one nineteenth-century city as seen through the lens of municipal legislation.
分享
查看原文
《旧车轮:土地上自行车历史的痕迹》罗伯特·l·麦卡洛著(书评)
按种族和阶级划分城市,这似乎是正确的,但没有详细说明,这个缺点也影响了其他章节。在最后一章“净化城市之肺”中,麦克诺尔讨论了与这个故事有关的常见怀疑,包括弗雷德里克·劳·奥姆斯德和儿童援助协会的创始人查尔斯·洛林·布雷斯,后者认为建立中央公园将使贫穷的劳动者受益。在对中央公园更为熟悉的叙述中,McNeur加入了拾荒者的生活和工作,他们是废品商店和二手商店网络的“大型企业家系统,他们充当中间人”,共同形成了“城市回收网络的关键环节”(190)。在结语中,McNeur以1863年的暴动草案和1866年纽约州的《都市卫生法》结束了她的调查,该法案为更严格的废物管理打开了大门。对于沉迷于19世纪城市或社会历史的读者来说,《驯服曼哈顿》的一个局限是,麦克尼尔严重依赖先前的学术成果,尤其是在讨论阶级时——尽管她确实利用了大量新的原始资料,例如,1833年,她通过多个委员会追踪了一项街道树木法令,并与她自己的非法占用者和养猪场主人数据库交叉核对了在骚乱草案中被捕的人的名字。更大的问题是文化分析薄弱。她常常依赖于关于控制城市空间的斗争的陈词滥调,以及这些斗争的种族和阶级含义,而没有提供关于它们如何在景观中表现出来的新鲜见解。更广泛地说,虽然McNeur因恢复了贫困居民创造并依赖于战前城市历史的以废物为中心的企业而受到赞扬,但她对这些活动如何改变我们理解城市化景观历史的方式的关注太少了。尽管如此,这部作品清晰明了,没有行话,偶尔闪现出生动的、甚至是悬疑的写作和令人回味的场景设置。《驯服曼哈顿》将被视为一本简明而精辟的概述,通过市政立法的视角,讲述了一座19世纪城市在城市空间上的斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信