Aboriginal Interactions with the Overland Telegraph Line, 1870–1880

Q2 Social Sciences
Philip Jones
{"title":"Aboriginal Interactions with the Overland Telegraph Line, 1870–1880","authors":"Philip Jones","doi":"10.18080/jtde.v11n1.714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aboriginal interactions with the Overland Telegraph Line, along its 3000 kilometres, were never uniform. The Line passed through at least twenty Aboriginal territories; when construction commenced, fewer than half of those groups had met Europeans. Aboriginal people in the northern and southern sections had experienced some contact, while only Stuart and his small band had passed through the central section. Archival records concerning the Line’s construction and its first years of operation reveal a consistent pattern of engagement: an initial phase of avoidance and fear followed by direct confrontation and engagement, often by the same Aboriginal group. In both cases, the trigger was not necessarily the white man’s presence per se, but the unprecedented temptation of large amounts of a new and extraordinary resource, metal. Prudently, Charles Todd issued instructions minimising fraternisation, which repressed the growing appeal of European commodities and material; armed parties attacked three telegraph stations during the mid-1870s. A pax Britannica gradually ensued. This paper focuses upon the first ten years of Aboriginal interactions, proposing a sequence of dynamic engagement with Europeans, prefiguring the subsequent tightening control and dispossession of local Aboriginal groups along the length of the Line.\n ","PeriodicalId":37752,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18080/jtde.v11n1.714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aboriginal interactions with the Overland Telegraph Line, along its 3000 kilometres, were never uniform. The Line passed through at least twenty Aboriginal territories; when construction commenced, fewer than half of those groups had met Europeans. Aboriginal people in the northern and southern sections had experienced some contact, while only Stuart and his small band had passed through the central section. Archival records concerning the Line’s construction and its first years of operation reveal a consistent pattern of engagement: an initial phase of avoidance and fear followed by direct confrontation and engagement, often by the same Aboriginal group. In both cases, the trigger was not necessarily the white man’s presence per se, but the unprecedented temptation of large amounts of a new and extraordinary resource, metal. Prudently, Charles Todd issued instructions minimising fraternisation, which repressed the growing appeal of European commodities and material; armed parties attacked three telegraph stations during the mid-1870s. A pax Britannica gradually ensued. This paper focuses upon the first ten years of Aboriginal interactions, proposing a sequence of dynamic engagement with Europeans, prefiguring the subsequent tightening control and dispossession of local Aboriginal groups along the length of the Line.  
原住民与陆上电报线的互动,1870-1880
在长达3000公里的陆上电报线路上,土著居民的互动从来都不是统一的。这条线至少穿过了20个土著领地;当建设开始时,只有不到一半的小组遇到了欧洲人。北部和南部地区的土著居民有过一些接触,而只有斯图尔特和他的一小群人穿过中部地区。关于这条线的建设及其最初几年的运作的档案记录揭示了一种一致的接触模式:最初阶段的回避和恐惧,随后是直接的对抗和接触,通常是同一个土著群体。在这两个案例中,触发因素不一定是白人的存在本身,而是大量新的、非凡的资源——金属——的前所未有的诱惑。查尔斯•托德(Charles Todd)谨慎地发布指示,尽量减少亲善,这抑制了欧洲商品和材料日益增长的吸引力;19世纪70年代中期,武装分子袭击了三个电报站。大英帝国的和平逐渐到来。本文聚焦于原住民互动的前十年,提出了一系列与欧洲人的动态接触,预示了随后对沿线当地原住民群体的严格控制和剥夺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy (JTDE) is an international, open-access, high quality, peer reviewed journal, indexed by Scopus and Google Scholar, covering innovative research and practice in Telecommunications, Digital Economy and Applications. The mission of JTDE is to further through publication the objective of advancing learning, knowledge and research worldwide. The JTDE publishes peer reviewed papers that may take the following form: *Research Paper - a paper making an original contribution to engineering knowledge. *Special Interest Paper – a report on significant aspects of a major or notable project. *Review Paper for specialists – an overview of a relevant area intended for specialists in the field covered. *Review Paper for non-specialists – an overview of a relevant area suitable for a reader with an electrical/electronics background. *Public Policy Discussion - a paper that identifies or discusses public policy and includes investigation of legislation, regulation and what is happening around the world including best practice *Tutorial Paper – a paper that explains an important subject or clarifies the approach to an area of design or investigation. *Technical Note – a technical note or letter to the Editors that is not sufficiently developed or extensive in scope to constitute a full paper. *Industry Case Study - a paper that provides details of industry practices utilising a case study to provide an understanding of what is occurring and how the outcomes have been achieved. *Discussion – a contribution to discuss a published paper to which the original author''s response will be sought. Historical - a paper covering a historical topic related to telecommunications or the digital economy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信