Comparison of work-related fatality surveillance in the U.S.A. and Australia

Nancy Stout , Michael S. Frommer , James Harrison
{"title":"Comparison of work-related fatality surveillance in the U.S.A. and Australia","authors":"Nancy Stout ,&nbsp;Michael S. Frommer ,&nbsp;James Harrison","doi":"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90021-M","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stout, N., Frommer, M.S. and Harrison, J.E., 1990. Comparison of work-related fatality surveillance in the U.S.A. and Australia. <em>Journal of Occupational Accidents</em>, 13: 195–211.</p><p>Recently conducted studies of traumatic work-related fatalities in the U.S.A. and Australia were compared and analyzed in order to identify ways of improving the quality and utility of fatal occupational injury surveillance data at national level. Methodological differences between the two studies are examined, and comparative data are presented. Despite differences in data acquisition methods and in the structure of the labor and work environment, the results of the two studies were remarkably similar. The mean annual rates of fatal injury while working, for persons in the employed civilian labor force during the period 1982–1984, were <span><math><mtext>5.9</mtext><mtext>100 000</mtext></math></span> in the U.S.A. and <span><math><mtext>6.7</mtext><mtext>100 000</mtext></math></span> in Australia. Because the U.S. data collection method is likely to have underestimated the occurrence of work-related fatalities, the difference between U.S. and Australian rates is probably over-estimated by these figures. The fatality rates for age, sex and employment groups were also similar. Considerations necessary for meaningful comparison of surveillance data from different sources are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 195-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90021-M","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037663499090021M","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Stout, N., Frommer, M.S. and Harrison, J.E., 1990. Comparison of work-related fatality surveillance in the U.S.A. and Australia. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 13: 195–211.

Recently conducted studies of traumatic work-related fatalities in the U.S.A. and Australia were compared and analyzed in order to identify ways of improving the quality and utility of fatal occupational injury surveillance data at national level. Methodological differences between the two studies are examined, and comparative data are presented. Despite differences in data acquisition methods and in the structure of the labor and work environment, the results of the two studies were remarkably similar. The mean annual rates of fatal injury while working, for persons in the employed civilian labor force during the period 1982–1984, were 5.9100 000 in the U.S.A. and 6.7100 000 in Australia. Because the U.S. data collection method is likely to have underestimated the occurrence of work-related fatalities, the difference between U.S. and Australian rates is probably over-estimated by these figures. The fatality rates for age, sex and employment groups were also similar. Considerations necessary for meaningful comparison of surveillance data from different sources are discussed.

美国和澳大利亚与工作有关的死亡监测比较
Stout, n.n, Frommer, M.S.和Harrison, j.e., 1990。美国和澳大利亚与工作有关的死亡监测比较。职业事故学报,13(3):195-211。最近在美国和澳大利亚进行的与工作有关的创伤性死亡研究进行了比较和分析,以确定在国家一级提高致命职业伤害监测数据的质量和效用的方法。两项研究之间的方法差异进行了检查,并提出了比较数据。尽管在数据获取方法和劳动结构和工作环境方面存在差异,但两项研究的结果却非常相似。1982-1984年期间,美国和澳大利亚的年均工伤死亡率分别为5910万和6710万。由于美国的数据收集方法可能低估了与工作有关的死亡人数,因此这些数据可能高估了美国和澳大利亚之间的差异。年龄、性别和就业群体的死亡率也相似。讨论了对不同来源的监测数据进行有意义比较的必要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信