Envisioning healthcare work: models for prospective evaluation of new systems

P. Sanderson, T. Xiao, Clinton Freeman, Wendy Broxham
{"title":"Envisioning healthcare work: models for prospective evaluation of new systems","authors":"P. Sanderson, T. Xiao, Clinton Freeman, Wendy Broxham","doi":"10.1145/2110363.2110457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When healthcare organizations plan the introduction of advanced health information systems, they need to envision future use. In this paper we describe four different ways of modeling the flow of information in a healthcare context: normative, indicating how information should flow; descriptive, indicating how information does flow now; formative, indicating how information could flow; and projective, indicating how information will flow with a specific new health information system. All approaches must work together for analysts to envision future use effectively. We illustrate the above distinctions with a case study based in the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (DDR) in a major tertiary hospital. DDR personnel were considering the introduction of software to help them schedule patient porterage (transport) services to, from, and within the department. Our prospective evaluation method let personnel see advantages and disadvantages of different ways of deploying the porterage software and led to the specification and design of the ValuesViewer™ application.","PeriodicalId":90523,"journal":{"name":"IHI ... : proceedings of the ... ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium. ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium","volume":"21 1","pages":"779-784"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IHI ... : proceedings of the ... ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium. ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2110363.2110457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

When healthcare organizations plan the introduction of advanced health information systems, they need to envision future use. In this paper we describe four different ways of modeling the flow of information in a healthcare context: normative, indicating how information should flow; descriptive, indicating how information does flow now; formative, indicating how information could flow; and projective, indicating how information will flow with a specific new health information system. All approaches must work together for analysts to envision future use effectively. We illustrate the above distinctions with a case study based in the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (DDR) in a major tertiary hospital. DDR personnel were considering the introduction of software to help them schedule patient porterage (transport) services to, from, and within the department. Our prospective evaluation method let personnel see advantages and disadvantages of different ways of deploying the porterage software and led to the specification and design of the ValuesViewer™ application.
设想医疗保健工作:新系统的前瞻性评估模型
当医疗保健组织计划引入先进的医疗信息系统时,他们需要设想未来的使用情况。在本文中,我们描述了在医疗保健环境中建模信息流的四种不同方式:规范,指示信息应该如何流动;描述性的,表明信息现在是如何流动的;形成性,表明信息如何流动;和投影,表明信息将如何流动与一个特定的新的卫生信息系统。所有方法必须协同工作,以便分析人员能够有效地设想未来的使用。我们以一个主要三级医院诊断放射科(DDR)的案例研究来说明上述区别。DDR人员正在考虑引入软件,以帮助他们安排进出部门和部门内部的病人搬运(运输)服务。我们的前瞻性评估方法让工作人员看到了部署搬运软件的不同方式的优缺点,并导致了ValuesViewer™应用程序的规范和设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书