Effect of Filler Content and Waiting time Before Light-Curing on Mechanical Properties of Dual-Cured Cement

A. C. Oliveira, S. Griza, R. R. de Moraes, A. Faria-E-Silva
{"title":"Effect of Filler Content and Waiting time Before Light-Curing on Mechanical Properties of Dual-Cured Cement","authors":"A. C. Oliveira, S. Griza, R. R. de Moraes, A. Faria-E-Silva","doi":"10.2174/2542579x01666190924180448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nTo investigate the effect of filler content and the time spent before light-curing\non mechanical properties of dual-cured cement.\n\n\n\nExperimental dual-cured resin cements were formulated with 60, 65 or 68wt% of filler.\nThe viscosity of experimental cement was measured using a digital viscometer. Bar-shaped specimens\n(25 x 2 x 2 mm) were fabricated, while the light-curing was started immediately or 5 minutes\nafter the insertion of cement into the mold (n = 7). A three-point bending test was performed and the\nvalues of flexural strength and elastic modulus were measured. The Vickers hardness of fractured\nspecimens was measured on the surface of the cement. Data from viscosity were submitted to oneway\nANOVA, while the data from mechanical properties were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. All\npair-wise comparisons were performed using Tukey’s test (α = 0.05).\n\n\n\nThe experimental cement with 68wt% of filler showed the highest viscosity and those with\n60wt% showed the the lowest viscosity. Irrespective of the time spent before light-curing, the cement\nwith 65wt% of filler presented the highest values of flexural strength and elastic modulus. The\naddition of 60wt% of filler resulted in the lowest elastic modulus, while 68wt% of filler resulted in\nlowest flexural strength. Regarding the hardness, the cement with 68wt% of filler showed the highest\nvalues, while there was no difference between 60 and 65wt% of filler.\n\n\n\n Filler content affected the mechanical properties of the experimental cement and this\neffect did not depend on the waiting time before the light-curing procedure.\n","PeriodicalId":10853,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in dentistry","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579x01666190924180448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the effect of filler content and the time spent before light-curing on mechanical properties of dual-cured cement. Experimental dual-cured resin cements were formulated with 60, 65 or 68wt% of filler. The viscosity of experimental cement was measured using a digital viscometer. Bar-shaped specimens (25 x 2 x 2 mm) were fabricated, while the light-curing was started immediately or 5 minutes after the insertion of cement into the mold (n = 7). A three-point bending test was performed and the values of flexural strength and elastic modulus were measured. The Vickers hardness of fractured specimens was measured on the surface of the cement. Data from viscosity were submitted to oneway ANOVA, while the data from mechanical properties were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. All pair-wise comparisons were performed using Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). The experimental cement with 68wt% of filler showed the highest viscosity and those with 60wt% showed the the lowest viscosity. Irrespective of the time spent before light-curing, the cement with 65wt% of filler presented the highest values of flexural strength and elastic modulus. The addition of 60wt% of filler resulted in the lowest elastic modulus, while 68wt% of filler resulted in lowest flexural strength. Regarding the hardness, the cement with 68wt% of filler showed the highest values, while there was no difference between 60 and 65wt% of filler. Filler content affected the mechanical properties of the experimental cement and this effect did not depend on the waiting time before the light-curing procedure.
填料掺量及光固化等待时间对双固化水泥力学性能的影响
探讨填料含量和光固化前时间对双固化水泥力学性能的影响。实验双固化树脂水泥分别以60%、65%或68%的填料配制。用数字式粘度计测量了实验水泥的粘度。制作棒状试样(25 x 2 x 2 mm),同时在将水泥插入模具后立即或5分钟开始光固化(n = 7)。进行三点弯曲试验,并测量弯曲强度和弹性模量值。在水泥表面测量了断裂试样的维氏硬度。粘度数据采用单因素方差分析,力学性能数据采用双因素方差分析。采用Tukey检验进行全对比较(α = 0.05)。掺量为68wt%的试验水泥粘度最高,掺量为60wt%的试验水泥粘度最低。与光固化前的时间无关,掺量为65%的水泥具有最高的抗弯强度和弹性模量。掺量为60wt%的填料导致弹性模量最低,而掺量为68wt%的填料导致抗弯强度最低。在硬度方面,掺量为68wt%的水泥硬度最高,掺量为60 wt%和65wt%的水泥硬度无显著差异。填料含量对试验水泥的力学性能有影响,且这种影响与光固化前的等待时间无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信