Comparative Analysis of Islamic Banks’ Performance in Indonesia and Malaysia with RGEC and the Islamicity Performance Index (2018-2021)

J. Manajemen, Tata Fatima Azzahra, M. Sholahuddin, Soepatini
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Islamic Banks’ Performance in Indonesia and Malaysia with RGEC and the Islamicity Performance Index (2018-2021)","authors":"J. Manajemen, Tata Fatima Azzahra, M. Sholahuddin, Soepatini","doi":"10.56457/jimk.v11i1.354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Governance, Profit, Capital) method for measuring financial performance and the Islamicity Performance Index (IPI) for measuring Shariah performance, this study seeks to identify differences in the performance of Islamic banks in Indonesia and Malaysia for the period from 2018-2021. Target sampling was used to select the sample, which consisted of secondary data from two Islamic banks in Indonesia and two Islamic banks in Malaysia from the banks’ 2018-2021 annual reports. Financial ratio analysis and various test analyses using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U method are used as analytic methods. According to the statistical calculations of the RGEC method, there is no difference in the average values of NPF, GCG, ROA, and BOPO, but there is a difference in the average values of FDR, ROE, NI, and CAR between Bank Syariah Indonesia and Bank Syariah Malaysia. The IPI method reveals that the average values of PSR, ZPR, EDR, and the ratio of Islamic Income vs non-Islamic Income recorded differences in average value, and the ratio of Islamic Investment vs non-Islamic Investment demonstrates that there is no difference between the average scores of Indonesian Shariah Banks and Malaysian Shariah Banks.","PeriodicalId":31929,"journal":{"name":"Kontigensi Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kontigensi Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v11i1.354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using the RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Governance, Profit, Capital) method for measuring financial performance and the Islamicity Performance Index (IPI) for measuring Shariah performance, this study seeks to identify differences in the performance of Islamic banks in Indonesia and Malaysia for the period from 2018-2021. Target sampling was used to select the sample, which consisted of secondary data from two Islamic banks in Indonesia and two Islamic banks in Malaysia from the banks’ 2018-2021 annual reports. Financial ratio analysis and various test analyses using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U method are used as analytic methods. According to the statistical calculations of the RGEC method, there is no difference in the average values of NPF, GCG, ROA, and BOPO, but there is a difference in the average values of FDR, ROE, NI, and CAR between Bank Syariah Indonesia and Bank Syariah Malaysia. The IPI method reveals that the average values of PSR, ZPR, EDR, and the ratio of Islamic Income vs non-Islamic Income recorded differences in average value, and the ratio of Islamic Investment vs non-Islamic Investment demonstrates that there is no difference between the average scores of Indonesian Shariah Banks and Malaysian Shariah Banks.
基于RGEC和伊斯兰性绩效指数的印尼和马来西亚伊斯兰银行绩效比较分析(2018-2021)
本研究使用RGEC(风险概况、良好治理、利润、资本)方法来衡量财务绩效,使用伊斯兰绩效指数(IPI)来衡量伊斯兰教法绩效,旨在确定2018-2021年期间印度尼西亚和马来西亚伊斯兰银行绩效的差异。目标抽样用于选择样本,该样本由印度尼西亚两家伊斯兰银行和马来西亚两家伊斯兰银行2018-2021年年报中的二手数据组成。分析方法采用财务比率分析和非参数Mann-Whitney U方法的各种检验分析。根据RGEC方法的统计计算,印度尼西亚伊斯兰银行和马来西亚伊斯兰银行的NPF、GCG、ROA和BOPO的平均值没有差异,但FDR、ROE、NI和CAR的平均值存在差异。IPI方法显示,PSR, ZPR, EDR的平均值以及伊斯兰收入与非伊斯兰收入的比率记录了平均值的差异,伊斯兰投资与非伊斯兰投资的比率表明印度尼西亚伊斯兰银行和马来西亚伊斯兰银行的平均得分没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信