Wellbore Failure Modelling Using a Modified Drucker-Prager Criterion

A. Younessi
{"title":"Wellbore Failure Modelling Using a Modified Drucker-Prager Criterion","authors":"A. Younessi","doi":"10.2523/IPTC-19126-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The failure around the wellbore is studied using a modified form of Drucker-Prager failure criterion (MDP). The MDP has a linear shear failure envelope in the meridian plane and a curve-sided triangular failure curve in the deviatoric plane which can be controlled by the yield stress ratio (K). The model is compatible with the rock strength measurements under true-triaxial stress conditions similar to the modified Lade (MLa) failure criterion.\n The MDP is used for stress modelling and wellbore stability analyses. The stress modelling is done by calculating the magnitude of maximum horizontal stress (SHmax) from the observed failure in the image log. The stress modelling result is compared with the results from the Mohr-Coulomb (MC), Drucker-Prager (DP), and modified Lade (MLa) criteria. The MDP is also used for wellbore stability analysis using both analytical and numerical (finite element) approaches. The analytical approach is used to conduct a sensitivity analysis to investigate the impact of well trajectory on minimum required mud weight. The finite element analysis is conducted to investigate the dimension of the breakout developed under different mud weights. The results are compared against the other failure criteria.\n The SHmax magnitude calculated from the MDP model falls between the MC and DP. The analysis shows that the MDP with K = 0.778 is compatible with the MLa results for a rock with an internal friction angle close to 30° for both SHmax magnitude modelling and minimum required mud weight calculations for the wellbore stability analysis.\n The results from the finite element analyses shows that the calculated breakout widths and depths using the MDP model falls between the MC and DP models. The analysis shows that in the presented case, although the calculated breakout width is large, the depth and amount of failed material around the wellbore are relatively small to create any wellbore instability problems. Hence, a mud weight relatively lower than calculated required mud weight from the analytical approach can be used in practice to drill the well. The results show the importance of considering the depth of the breakouts in the mud weight design.","PeriodicalId":11267,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19126-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The failure around the wellbore is studied using a modified form of Drucker-Prager failure criterion (MDP). The MDP has a linear shear failure envelope in the meridian plane and a curve-sided triangular failure curve in the deviatoric plane which can be controlled by the yield stress ratio (K). The model is compatible with the rock strength measurements under true-triaxial stress conditions similar to the modified Lade (MLa) failure criterion. The MDP is used for stress modelling and wellbore stability analyses. The stress modelling is done by calculating the magnitude of maximum horizontal stress (SHmax) from the observed failure in the image log. The stress modelling result is compared with the results from the Mohr-Coulomb (MC), Drucker-Prager (DP), and modified Lade (MLa) criteria. The MDP is also used for wellbore stability analysis using both analytical and numerical (finite element) approaches. The analytical approach is used to conduct a sensitivity analysis to investigate the impact of well trajectory on minimum required mud weight. The finite element analysis is conducted to investigate the dimension of the breakout developed under different mud weights. The results are compared against the other failure criteria. The SHmax magnitude calculated from the MDP model falls between the MC and DP. The analysis shows that the MDP with K = 0.778 is compatible with the MLa results for a rock with an internal friction angle close to 30° for both SHmax magnitude modelling and minimum required mud weight calculations for the wellbore stability analysis. The results from the finite element analyses shows that the calculated breakout widths and depths using the MDP model falls between the MC and DP models. The analysis shows that in the presented case, although the calculated breakout width is large, the depth and amount of failed material around the wellbore are relatively small to create any wellbore instability problems. Hence, a mud weight relatively lower than calculated required mud weight from the analytical approach can be used in practice to drill the well. The results show the importance of considering the depth of the breakouts in the mud weight design.
基于改进Drucker-Prager准则的井筒破坏建模
采用改进的Drucker-Prager破坏准则(MDP)对井筒周围的破坏进行了研究。该模型在子午面具有线性剪切破坏包络线,在偏面具有受屈服应力比(K)控制的曲线边三角形破坏曲线。该模型与真三轴应力条件下的岩石强度测量结果相适应,类似于修正Lade (MLa)破坏准则。MDP用于应力建模和井筒稳定性分析。应力建模是通过计算图像测井中观察到的最大水平应力(SHmax)的大小来完成的。将应力模拟结果与Mohr-Coulomb (MC)、Drucker-Prager (DP)和修正Lade (MLa)准则的结果进行了比较。MDP还可用于通过解析和数值(有限元)方法进行井筒稳定性分析。利用该分析方法进行敏感性分析,研究井眼轨迹对最小泥浆密度的影响。通过有限元分析,研究了在不同泥浆比重下形成的漏孔尺寸。结果与其他失效准则进行了比较。MDP模型计算的最大震级介于MC和DP之间。分析表明,对于内摩擦角接近30°的岩石,K = 0.778的MDP与MLa结果兼容,无论是SHmax震级建模还是井筒稳定性分析所需的最小泥浆密度计算。有限元分析结果表明,MDP模型计算出的漏孔宽度和深度介于MC模型和DP模型之间。分析表明,在本例中,虽然计算出的漏缝宽度很大,但井筒周围的破坏材料深度和数量相对较小,不会产生任何井筒不稳定问题。因此,在实际钻井中,可以使用比分析方法计算出的所需泥浆比重相对较低的泥浆比重。结果表明,在泥浆比重设计中考虑突兀深度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信