Calculation of protein-ligand binding free energy using smooth reaction path generation (SRPG) method: a comparison of the explicit water model, gb/sa model and docking score function.

D. Mitomo, Y. Fukunishi, J. Higo, Haruki Nakamura
{"title":"Calculation of protein-ligand binding free energy using smooth reaction path generation (SRPG) method: a comparison of the explicit water model, gb/sa model and docking score function.","authors":"D. Mitomo, Y. Fukunishi, J. Higo, Haruki Nakamura","doi":"10.1142/9781848165632_0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared the protein-ligand binding free energies (G) obtained by the explicit water model, the MM-GB/SA (molecular-mechanics generalized Born surface area) model, and the docking scoring function. The free energies by the explicit water model and the MM-GB/SA model were calculated by the previously developed Smooth Reaction Path Generation (SRPG) method. In the SRPG method, a smooth reaction path was generated by linking two coordinates, one a bound state and the other an unbound state. The free energy surface along the path was calculated by a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, and the binding free energy was estimated from the free energy surface. We applied these methods to the streptavidin-and-biotin system. The G value by the explicit water model was close to the experimental value. The G value by the MM-GB/SA model was overestimated and that by the scoring function was underestimated. The free energy surface by the explicit water model was close to that by the GB/SA model around the bound state (distances of < 6 A), but the discrepancy appears at distances of > 6 A. Thus, the difference in long-range Coulomb interaction should cause the error in G. The scoring function cannot take into account the entropy change of the protein. Thus, the error of G could depend on the target protein.","PeriodicalId":73143,"journal":{"name":"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics","volume":"6 1","pages":"85-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848165632_0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

We compared the protein-ligand binding free energies (G) obtained by the explicit water model, the MM-GB/SA (molecular-mechanics generalized Born surface area) model, and the docking scoring function. The free energies by the explicit water model and the MM-GB/SA model were calculated by the previously developed Smooth Reaction Path Generation (SRPG) method. In the SRPG method, a smooth reaction path was generated by linking two coordinates, one a bound state and the other an unbound state. The free energy surface along the path was calculated by a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, and the binding free energy was estimated from the free energy surface. We applied these methods to the streptavidin-and-biotin system. The G value by the explicit water model was close to the experimental value. The G value by the MM-GB/SA model was overestimated and that by the scoring function was underestimated. The free energy surface by the explicit water model was close to that by the GB/SA model around the bound state (distances of < 6 A), but the discrepancy appears at distances of > 6 A. Thus, the difference in long-range Coulomb interaction should cause the error in G. The scoring function cannot take into account the entropy change of the protein. Thus, the error of G could depend on the target protein.
我们比较了显式水模型、MM-GB/SA(分子力学广义Born表面积)模型和对接评分函数得到的蛋白质-配体结合自由能(G)。通过显式水模型和MM-GB/SA模型计算自由能,采用光滑反应路径生成(SRPG)方法。在SRPG方法中,通过连接两个坐标,一个是束缚态,另一个是非束缚态,来生成光滑的反应路径。通过分子动力学(MD)模拟计算了沿路径的自由能面,并从自由能面估计了结合自由能。我们将这些方法应用于链霉亲和素-生物素系统。显式水模型计算的G值与实验值较为接近。MM-GB/SA模型的G值被高估,评分函数的G值被低估。在束缚态(< 6 A)附近,显式水模型的自由能面与GB/SA模型的自由能面接近,但在> 6 A处出现差异。因此,远程库仑相互作用的差异会导致g的误差。评分函数不能考虑蛋白质的熵变。因此,G的误差可能取决于靶蛋白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信