{"title":"Managers' Remote Work and Expertise across Cultures","authors":"C. Reis","doi":"10.9774/GLEAF.3709.2016.JU.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionRemote management is currently a routine task in organizational life. However, at any given time, some of an organization's members will struggle with personal challenges, such as remote management of cross-cultural environments and local entrepreneurship.While a manager's remote-work emphasis is on virtual-team performance, the need to attend to conflicts, communication, and cultural perspectives has grown considerably in recent years (e.g., Mulki et al., 2009; Maznevski et al., 2000); the herein presented understanding of individual managers' remote work-such as sending instructions from A to B-implies that their managerial inputs arrive in cross-cultural environments without those managers' physical displacement. This study examines the unique expertise that enables managers to implement their cross-cultural projects remotely, since little research into this topic yet exists. It also explores this question through an inductive, interviewbased study of remote managers working for the United States Government in Washington, D.C. Furthermore, it identifies circumstances that engender such managers' work expertise in virtual workplaces where work is divided according to space, time, and performance pressures.Significantly, this article adopts a Bourdieuian organizational perspective, focusing on the situated, everyday activities of managers' remote work. This allows for the recognition of objective structures and subjective experiences as important aspects of distance-management dynamics that must be understood. The Bourdieuian organizational perspective involves looking at situated activities in order to comprehend contextual circumstances. This perspective emphasizes the relationships that emerge between organizational contexts and component behavior (individuals and groups) and examines how these relationships affect outcomes (House, Rouseau and Thomas-Hunt, 1995).From the aforementioned perspective, then, this analysis examines the significant mechanisms that emerge from managers' remote-work expertise apropos of implementing projects, specifically local enterprises, in cross-cultural organizational contexts. The cross-cultural implementation of a project has certain performance implications for both individuals and enterprises. The complexity of this situation is greater when projects are supervised remotely because this requires cross-cultural management expertise in understanding local individuals and enterprises-an unexamined form of work whose study can strengthen management and entrepreneurship theories and practices.The following sections review theories and research underpinning the theoretical framework for this study's stated focus on the in-context management of local small enterprises. Interviews with government contractors and supervisors (remote managers) constitute a portion of this analysis to aid in theorizing links between managers' remote work and a set of project-implementation mechanisms, with a view to describing remote-work expertise itself. This study concludes with a discussion of the theoretical contributions it makes to applied management and entrepreneurship theories. Implications for practitioners and suggestions for future research are also discussed.A review of extant literature on remote work managersBefore discussing the actual work managers do-particularly when they manage projects remotely-it is only proper to review the existing literature on remote management and remote managers' work in the present section.There are several debates on remote management, and these focus on virtualteam performance, conflicts, communication, and cultural perspectives (e.g., Mulki et al., 2009; Maznevski et al., 2000), as well as on remote work and work-life balance (e.g., Baugh et al., 2013). However, little has been written on remote managers' actual work when dealing with cross-cultural projects pertaining to local individuals and enterprises. …","PeriodicalId":90357,"journal":{"name":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","volume":"61 1","pages":"97-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3709.2016.JU.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
IntroductionRemote management is currently a routine task in organizational life. However, at any given time, some of an organization's members will struggle with personal challenges, such as remote management of cross-cultural environments and local entrepreneurship.While a manager's remote-work emphasis is on virtual-team performance, the need to attend to conflicts, communication, and cultural perspectives has grown considerably in recent years (e.g., Mulki et al., 2009; Maznevski et al., 2000); the herein presented understanding of individual managers' remote work-such as sending instructions from A to B-implies that their managerial inputs arrive in cross-cultural environments without those managers' physical displacement. This study examines the unique expertise that enables managers to implement their cross-cultural projects remotely, since little research into this topic yet exists. It also explores this question through an inductive, interviewbased study of remote managers working for the United States Government in Washington, D.C. Furthermore, it identifies circumstances that engender such managers' work expertise in virtual workplaces where work is divided according to space, time, and performance pressures.Significantly, this article adopts a Bourdieuian organizational perspective, focusing on the situated, everyday activities of managers' remote work. This allows for the recognition of objective structures and subjective experiences as important aspects of distance-management dynamics that must be understood. The Bourdieuian organizational perspective involves looking at situated activities in order to comprehend contextual circumstances. This perspective emphasizes the relationships that emerge between organizational contexts and component behavior (individuals and groups) and examines how these relationships affect outcomes (House, Rouseau and Thomas-Hunt, 1995).From the aforementioned perspective, then, this analysis examines the significant mechanisms that emerge from managers' remote-work expertise apropos of implementing projects, specifically local enterprises, in cross-cultural organizational contexts. The cross-cultural implementation of a project has certain performance implications for both individuals and enterprises. The complexity of this situation is greater when projects are supervised remotely because this requires cross-cultural management expertise in understanding local individuals and enterprises-an unexamined form of work whose study can strengthen management and entrepreneurship theories and practices.The following sections review theories and research underpinning the theoretical framework for this study's stated focus on the in-context management of local small enterprises. Interviews with government contractors and supervisors (remote managers) constitute a portion of this analysis to aid in theorizing links between managers' remote work and a set of project-implementation mechanisms, with a view to describing remote-work expertise itself. This study concludes with a discussion of the theoretical contributions it makes to applied management and entrepreneurship theories. Implications for practitioners and suggestions for future research are also discussed.A review of extant literature on remote work managersBefore discussing the actual work managers do-particularly when they manage projects remotely-it is only proper to review the existing literature on remote management and remote managers' work in the present section.There are several debates on remote management, and these focus on virtualteam performance, conflicts, communication, and cultural perspectives (e.g., Mulki et al., 2009; Maznevski et al., 2000), as well as on remote work and work-life balance (e.g., Baugh et al., 2013). However, little has been written on remote managers' actual work when dealing with cross-cultural projects pertaining to local individuals and enterprises. …
远程管理是当前组织生活中的一项常规任务。然而,在任何给定的时间,组织的一些成员将与个人挑战作斗争,例如跨文化环境的远程管理和本地创业。尽管管理者的远程工作重点是虚拟团队绩效,但近年来,对冲突、沟通和文化视角的关注也显著增加(例如,Mulki等人,2009;Maznevski et al., 2000);本文提出的对个别管理者远程工作的理解——例如从A向b发送指令——意味着他们的管理投入在跨文化环境中到达,而这些管理者没有物理位移。本研究考察了使管理者能够远程实施跨文化项目的独特专业知识,因为对这一主题的研究还很少。它还通过对在华盛顿特区为美国政府工作的远程管理人员的归纳式、基于访谈的研究来探讨这个问题。此外,它确定了在虚拟工作场所中产生这些管理人员的工作专长的情况,在虚拟工作场所中,工作是根据空间、时间和绩效压力进行划分的。值得注意的是,本文采用了布迪厄的组织视角,关注管理者远程工作的情境日常活动。这样就可以认识到客观结构和主观经验是必须了解的距离管理动态的重要方面。布迪厄的组织视角包括观察情境活动,以理解上下文环境。这种观点强调组织环境和组成部分行为(个人和群体)之间的关系,并研究这些关系如何影响结果(House, rousseau和Thomas-Hunt, 1995)。从上述的角度来看,本分析考察了在跨文化组织背景下,管理人员远程工作专业知识中出现的重要机制,特别是当地企业。项目的跨文化实施对个人和企业都有一定的绩效影响。当项目被远程监督时,这种情况的复杂性更大,因为这需要跨文化管理专业知识来了解当地的个人和企业——这是一种未经检验的工作形式,其研究可以加强管理和创业理论和实践。以下章节回顾了支撑本研究的理论框架的理论和研究,该研究的重点是地方小企业的情境管理。与政府承包商和监督员(远程管理人员)的访谈构成了这一分析的一部分,以帮助将管理人员的远程工作与一套项目执行机制之间的联系理论化,以期描述远程工作专门知识本身。本研究最后讨论了其对应用管理和创业理论的理论贡献。本文也讨论了对实务人员的启示及对未来研究的建议。在讨论管理者的实际工作——特别是当他们远程管理项目的时候——之前,只有在本节中回顾一下关于远程管理和远程管理者工作的现有文献是合适的。关于远程管理有一些争论,这些争论集中在虚拟团队的绩效、冲突、沟通和文化视角上(例如,Mulki等人,2009;Maznevski et al., 2000),以及远程工作和工作与生活平衡(例如,Baugh et al., 2013)。然而,关于远程管理人员在处理与本地个人和企业有关的跨文化项目时的实际工作的文章很少。...