SWEPT PATH ANALYSES USING UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM (UAS)

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Kornelija Bogdan, I. Barišić, Vladimir Moser, Damir Rajle
{"title":"SWEPT PATH ANALYSES USING UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM (UAS)","authors":"Kornelija Bogdan, I. Barišić, Vladimir Moser, Damir Rajle","doi":"10.13167/2022.25.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was the verification of unmanned aerial system (UAS) application in vehicle swept path analyses by analysing the advantages and disadvantages and comparing field test results with two software solutions. In this study, swept-path analyses were performed for two vehicle types and two turning angles. UAS images were used to extract the vehicle swept path and the results were compared with two commonly used swept-path analysis software. The results indicated larger deviations between the swept paths for an angle of 125° for a light truck. For both analysed vehicles and turning angles, larger deviations were observed for the outermost point trajectory. Passenger cars occupy less space performing 125° turns than software analysis predicts, indicating that they are on the safe side when designing vehicle manipulative surfaces. For the analysed light truck, a larger turning radius was observed than the predicted for a 125° turning angle, which may be caused by the approaching and turning speeds under which the test was performed. Finally, while the UAS recording process is relatively simple and fast, data processing is demanding and time-consuming. To fulfil its full potential within swept path analyses, UAS needs to be complemented by proper data analysis software solutions for faster and more accurate swept path extraction, which would improve and rationalise the traffic area designing process.","PeriodicalId":29665,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13167/2022.25.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was the verification of unmanned aerial system (UAS) application in vehicle swept path analyses by analysing the advantages and disadvantages and comparing field test results with two software solutions. In this study, swept-path analyses were performed for two vehicle types and two turning angles. UAS images were used to extract the vehicle swept path and the results were compared with two commonly used swept-path analysis software. The results indicated larger deviations between the swept paths for an angle of 125° for a light truck. For both analysed vehicles and turning angles, larger deviations were observed for the outermost point trajectory. Passenger cars occupy less space performing 125° turns than software analysis predicts, indicating that they are on the safe side when designing vehicle manipulative surfaces. For the analysed light truck, a larger turning radius was observed than the predicted for a 125° turning angle, which may be caused by the approaching and turning speeds under which the test was performed. Finally, while the UAS recording process is relatively simple and fast, data processing is demanding and time-consuming. To fulfil its full potential within swept path analyses, UAS needs to be complemented by proper data analysis software solutions for faster and more accurate swept path extraction, which would improve and rationalise the traffic area designing process.
无人机扫描路径分析(was)
本研究的目的是通过分析两种软件解决方案的优缺点并比较现场测试结果,验证无人机系统(UAS)在车辆扫掠路径分析中的应用。在本研究中,对两种车辆类型和两种转弯角度进行了扫描路径分析。利用无人机图像提取车辆扫描路径,并与两种常用扫描路径分析软件进行比较。结果表明,对于轻型卡车,125°角时扫掠路径之间的偏差较大。对于分析的车辆和转弯角度,观察到最外层点轨迹的较大偏差。乘用车在125°转弯时占用的空间比软件分析预测的要少,这表明在设计车辆操纵面时,它们是安全的。对于所分析的轻型卡车,在125°转弯角度下观察到的转弯半径比预测的要大,这可能是由接近和转弯速度造成的。最后,虽然UAS记录过程相对简单和快速,但数据处理要求高且耗时。为了充分发挥扫描路径分析的潜力,无人机系统需要适当的数据分析软件解决方案,以更快和更准确地提取扫描路径,这将改善和合理化交通区域设计过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信