{"title":"Not Quite Wright: Re-performing Frank Lloyd Wright's Architecture Ex Situ","authors":"A. Paine","doi":"10.5749/futuante.15.2.0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:When the threat of recurrent flooding forced the drastic decision to move Frank Lloyd Wright's 1954 Bachman-Wilson House in New Jersey to the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonville, Arkansas, not all of the building made the journey. Despite the museum's assertion that the \"entire structure was … taken apart and each component … labeled, packed, and moved to the Museum, where it was reconstructed in 2015,\" photographs of the reconstruction and other statements by the museum confirm otherwise. In reality, only the mahogany linings, timber surfaces, joinery, and furniture were reused—much of the building's structure was left behind or in storage.Like many buildings reconstructed for display ex situ, the Bachman-Wilson house has undergone a major transformation. Detached from their supporting structures, architectural fragments, facades, period rooms, and entire houses have become new, distorted, and ambiguous objects in museum collections, often likened pejoratively to theatrical stage sets. What, however, should be made of such exhibits, and what might they reveal about architecture more generally? Through a focused study of the Bachman-Wilson House, this essay offers a theorized account of the transformation of architecture relocated for display, providing new insights into such aberrant and misunderstood monuments.","PeriodicalId":53609,"journal":{"name":"Future Anterior","volume":"15 1","pages":"62 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Anterior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/futuante.15.2.0063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:When the threat of recurrent flooding forced the drastic decision to move Frank Lloyd Wright's 1954 Bachman-Wilson House in New Jersey to the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art in Bentonville, Arkansas, not all of the building made the journey. Despite the museum's assertion that the "entire structure was … taken apart and each component … labeled, packed, and moved to the Museum, where it was reconstructed in 2015," photographs of the reconstruction and other statements by the museum confirm otherwise. In reality, only the mahogany linings, timber surfaces, joinery, and furniture were reused—much of the building's structure was left behind or in storage.Like many buildings reconstructed for display ex situ, the Bachman-Wilson house has undergone a major transformation. Detached from their supporting structures, architectural fragments, facades, period rooms, and entire houses have become new, distorted, and ambiguous objects in museum collections, often likened pejoratively to theatrical stage sets. What, however, should be made of such exhibits, and what might they reveal about architecture more generally? Through a focused study of the Bachman-Wilson House, this essay offers a theorized account of the transformation of architecture relocated for display, providing new insights into such aberrant and misunderstood monuments.
摘要:由于频繁的洪水威胁,建筑师不得不做出一个重大的决定,将弗兰克·劳埃德·赖特(Frank Lloyd Wright) 1954年在新泽西州建造的巴赫曼-威尔逊故居(Bachman-Wilson House)搬到阿肯色州本顿维尔(Bentonville)的水晶桥美国艺术博物馆(Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art),但并非所有的建筑都能完成搬迁。尽管博物馆声称“整个结构被……拆开,每个部件都被……贴上标签、包装,并转移到博物馆,并于2015年在那里重建”,但重建的照片和博物馆的其他声明却证实了相反的情况。实际上,只有红木衬里、木材表面、细木工和家具被重新利用,建筑的大部分结构都被留下或储存起来。像许多重建的建筑一样,巴赫曼-威尔逊的房子也经历了一次重大的转变。从支撑结构中分离出来,建筑碎片、立面、时代房间和整个房屋已经成为博物馆收藏中新的、扭曲的和模糊的对象,经常被贬义地比作戏剧舞台布景。然而,我们应该如何看待这样的展览?它们可能会更普遍地揭示建筑的哪些方面?通过对巴赫曼-威尔逊故居的重点研究,这篇文章提供了一个理论化的描述,为重新安置的展示建筑的转变提供了新的见解,为这些异常和被误解的纪念碑提供了新的见解。