The Wounded World: A Study of the Ecological Consciousness in the Poetry of Niranjan Mohanty

S. Bose
{"title":"The Wounded World: A Study of the Ecological Consciousness in the Poetry of Niranjan Mohanty","authors":"S. Bose","doi":"10.29070/15/57730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cheryll Glotfelty‟s definition of ecocriticism as “the study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment” has incited the minds of the critics to give a deep thought to the condition of the natural world, constantly under threat due to anthropogenic activities. Activities like deforestation, unreasonable use of natural resources, spreading pollutants in the environment has benefitted man initially but disturbed the ecological equilibrium giving rise to great disasters in the human community. According to William Rueckert, the most glaring problem faced by ecologists is to find grounds upon which both the human and the natural world can coexist and flourish in the same biosphere. Literature plays a vital role in creating/disseminating bioregional consciousness in human beings. Niranjan Mohanty is quite aware of this fact and his poems provide ample illustrations to this. In this paper I shall take up certain representative poems of Mohanty like “A Subtle Difference”, “A Poem that Never Begins”, \" Digging\", “Kalahandi”, \"Grief\",“The World”, “Prayers to Lord Jagannatha” etc. to discuss Mohanty‟s consciousness regarding nature which, if disturbed, threatens the existence of man on earth. X Little we see in Nature that is ours; We have given our hearts away, a sordid boon! This sea that bears her bosom to the moon; The winds that will be howling at all hours, And are up-gathered now like sleeping flowers; For this, for everything, we are out of tune; It moves us not. (―The World is Too Much with Us‖ MP, 180) This sonnet by Wordsworth very well express the insensitiveness of human beings towards the beauty of nature. Men are always busy in amassing more and more wealth and spending those. What Wordsworth said years ago is more than true in this post-modern age. Nature has always been a constant source of support to human beings but human beings have always exploited nature for their own benefit. Compared to nature‘s benevolence towards human beings, man has done very little for nature. The different activities of man like deforestation, unreasonable use of natural resources, spreading pollutants in the environment through various activities have not only threatened nature but also threatened the existence of man on earth. The consumerist attitude of man has disturbed the ecological equilibrium which has led to very big disasters in the human community. Therefore, for a safe and healthy living, maintenance of ecological balance should be one of the primary concerns of man. The 20 th century has led scientists, artists and critics to think and develop ways to create an awareness in man regarding nature and her preservation. This has given birth to a new genre called ―nature writing‖. The relationship between living organisms and their environment are very active, one affecting the other either with its presence or absence. This serious issue has created a new branch of literary theory called Ecocriticism, defined by Cheryll Glotfelty in The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology as: The study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment the study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment. Just as feminist criticism examines language and literature from a gender-conscious perspective, and Marxist criticism brings an awareness of modes of production and economic class to its reading of texts, ecocriticism takes an earth-centred approach to literary studies (Glotfelty: 1996, xviii). Literature is the platform which is utilized to unravel our awareness towards nature. In fact, literature","PeriodicalId":14911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29070/15/57730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cheryll Glotfelty‟s definition of ecocriticism as “the study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment” has incited the minds of the critics to give a deep thought to the condition of the natural world, constantly under threat due to anthropogenic activities. Activities like deforestation, unreasonable use of natural resources, spreading pollutants in the environment has benefitted man initially but disturbed the ecological equilibrium giving rise to great disasters in the human community. According to William Rueckert, the most glaring problem faced by ecologists is to find grounds upon which both the human and the natural world can coexist and flourish in the same biosphere. Literature plays a vital role in creating/disseminating bioregional consciousness in human beings. Niranjan Mohanty is quite aware of this fact and his poems provide ample illustrations to this. In this paper I shall take up certain representative poems of Mohanty like “A Subtle Difference”, “A Poem that Never Begins”, " Digging", “Kalahandi”, "Grief",“The World”, “Prayers to Lord Jagannatha” etc. to discuss Mohanty‟s consciousness regarding nature which, if disturbed, threatens the existence of man on earth. X Little we see in Nature that is ours; We have given our hearts away, a sordid boon! This sea that bears her bosom to the moon; The winds that will be howling at all hours, And are up-gathered now like sleeping flowers; For this, for everything, we are out of tune; It moves us not. (―The World is Too Much with Us‖ MP, 180) This sonnet by Wordsworth very well express the insensitiveness of human beings towards the beauty of nature. Men are always busy in amassing more and more wealth and spending those. What Wordsworth said years ago is more than true in this post-modern age. Nature has always been a constant source of support to human beings but human beings have always exploited nature for their own benefit. Compared to nature‘s benevolence towards human beings, man has done very little for nature. The different activities of man like deforestation, unreasonable use of natural resources, spreading pollutants in the environment through various activities have not only threatened nature but also threatened the existence of man on earth. The consumerist attitude of man has disturbed the ecological equilibrium which has led to very big disasters in the human community. Therefore, for a safe and healthy living, maintenance of ecological balance should be one of the primary concerns of man. The 20 th century has led scientists, artists and critics to think and develop ways to create an awareness in man regarding nature and her preservation. This has given birth to a new genre called ―nature writing‖. The relationship between living organisms and their environment are very active, one affecting the other either with its presence or absence. This serious issue has created a new branch of literary theory called Ecocriticism, defined by Cheryll Glotfelty in The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology as: The study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment the study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment. Just as feminist criticism examines language and literature from a gender-conscious perspective, and Marxist criticism brings an awareness of modes of production and economic class to its reading of texts, ecocriticism takes an earth-centred approach to literary studies (Glotfelty: 1996, xviii). Literature is the platform which is utilized to unravel our awareness towards nature. In fact, literature
受伤的世界:莫汉蒂诗歌中的生态意识研究
谢丽尔·格洛特菲蒂(cheryl Glotfelty)将生态批评定义为“研究文学与自然环境之间的关系”,这激发了批评家们对不断受到人类活动威胁的自然世界状况进行深入思考。森林砍伐、自然资源的不合理利用、污染物在环境中的扩散等活动给人类带来了最初的好处,但却破坏了生态平衡,给人类社会带来了巨大的灾难。根据威廉•Rueckert生态学家所面临的最突出的问题是找到人类和自然世界的理由可以共存和在相同的生物圈。文学在创造/传播人类的生物地域意识方面起着至关重要的作用。Niranjan Mohanty非常清楚这一事实,他的诗歌对此提供了充分的说明。本文将以莫汉蒂的代表作《细微的差别》、《永不开始的诗》、《挖掘》、《卡拉汉迪》、《悲伤》、《世界》、《向上帝祈祷》等为例,探讨莫汉蒂的自然意识,这种意识一旦受到干扰,就会威胁到人类在地球上的生存。我们在大自然中看到的属于我们的东西很少;我们出卖了我们的心,一个肮脏的恩惠!这大海把她的胸脯抱向月亮;风会随时咆哮,现在又聚集起来,像沉睡的花朵;在这一点上,在一切事情上,我们都走调了;它不会感动我们。华兹华斯的这首十四行诗很好地表达了人类对自然之美的冷漠。人们总是忙于积累越来越多的财富,然后花掉这些财富。华兹华斯多年前说过的话在后现代时代再正确不过了。自然一直是人类赖以生存的源泉,但人类却一直在为自己的利益而剥削自然。与大自然对人类的仁慈相比,人类为大自然做的很少。人类的各种活动,如砍伐森林,不合理利用自然资源,通过各种活动在环境中传播污染物,不仅威胁着自然,也威胁着人类在地球上的生存。人类的消费主义态度扰乱了生态平衡,给人类社会带来了巨大的灾难。因此,为了安全健康的生活,维护生态平衡应该是人类首要关注的问题之一。20世纪,科学家、艺术家和评论家们开始思考和发展各种方法,以培养人们对自然及其保护的意识。这催生了一种叫做“自然写作”的新体裁。生物与其环境之间的关系是非常活跃的,一方存在或不存在都会影响另一方。这个严重的问题创造了一个新的文学理论分支,叫做生态批评,谢丽尔·格洛特菲蒂在《生态批评读本:文学生态学的里程碑》中将其定义为:研究文学与自然环境之间的关系研究文学与自然环境之间的关系。正如女权主义批评从性别意识的角度审视语言和文学,马克思主义批评将生产方式和经济阶级的意识带入文本阅读,生态批评采取了以地球为中心的文学研究方法(Glotfelty: 1996, xviii)。文学是用来揭示我们对自然意识的平台。事实上,文学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信