KOMPARASI PRINSIP VERIFIKASI POSITIVISME LOGIS DAN PENERAPAN HUKUM QIYAS

M. Marovida Aziz
{"title":"KOMPARASI PRINSIP VERIFIKASI POSITIVISME LOGIS DAN PENERAPAN HUKUM QIYAS","authors":"M. Marovida Aziz","doi":"10.24239/rsy.v17i2.790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThe view of the logical positivism group regarding science is based on the development of exact sciences, scientific truth can be measured positively, namely the truth must be real, concrete, logical, accurate and useful, but the effect behind everything abstract and metaphysical in the dimensions of life is ignored and regardless of observation. The main idea of logical positivism that was promoted by Alfred Jules Ayer, one of which is the principle of verification. In the application of the verification principle, it can also be taken for study studies in the determination of Qiyas law, namely by analogizing a law that has not yet been stipulated in the text, by testing and observing by verifying the causes of its similarity with the established law, determining the similarity of causes with logical parameters. and also empirical. The analogy in Qiyas must go through a verification stage, namely because it must be a real and visible nature by the five senses, and logic, as well as through the empirical proof stage. According to logical positivism and qiyas, the main condition is that it must be something that is visible, and get rid of pseudo-problems. \nKeywords: Logical positivism, Verification, Qiyas.","PeriodicalId":31634,"journal":{"name":"Fikrah Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fikrah Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24239/rsy.v17i2.790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The view of the logical positivism group regarding science is based on the development of exact sciences, scientific truth can be measured positively, namely the truth must be real, concrete, logical, accurate and useful, but the effect behind everything abstract and metaphysical in the dimensions of life is ignored and regardless of observation. The main idea of logical positivism that was promoted by Alfred Jules Ayer, one of which is the principle of verification. In the application of the verification principle, it can also be taken for study studies in the determination of Qiyas law, namely by analogizing a law that has not yet been stipulated in the text, by testing and observing by verifying the causes of its similarity with the established law, determining the similarity of causes with logical parameters. and also empirical. The analogy in Qiyas must go through a verification stage, namely because it must be a real and visible nature by the five senses, and logic, as well as through the empirical proof stage. According to logical positivism and qiyas, the main condition is that it must be something that is visible, and get rid of pseudo-problems. Keywords: Logical positivism, Verification, Qiyas.
对气功原理的验证与QIYAS定律的应用进行比较
逻辑实证主义派对科学的看法是建立在精确科学发展的基础上,科学真理是可以被积极地衡量的,即真理必须是真实的、具体的、合乎逻辑的、准确的和有用的,但在生活的维度中,抽象的、形而上的一切事物背后的作用却被忽视和不加观察。逻辑实证主义的主要思想是阿尔弗雷德·朱尔斯·阿耶尔提出的,其中之一就是验证原则。在验证原则的应用中,也可将其作为研究研究,用于确定齐亚斯法,即通过对文本中尚未规定的法律进行类比,通过验证其与既定法律相似的原因进行测试和观察,通过逻辑参数确定原因的相似性。也是经验性的。齐亚斯的类比必须经过一个验证阶段,即因为它必须是一个真实的、可见的、由五感和逻辑构成的本质,也必须经过经验证明阶段。根据逻辑实证主义和齐亚斯的观点,主要的条件是它必须是可见的东西,并且要摆脱伪问题。关键词:逻辑实证主义,验证,齐亚斯
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书