Hiatal hernia surgery: laparoscopic versus robotic approach?

Q3 Medicine
R. Komarov, S. Osminin, I. R. Bilyalov
{"title":"Hiatal hernia surgery: laparoscopic versus robotic approach?","authors":"R. Komarov, S. Osminin, I. R. Bilyalov","doi":"10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-1-15-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations.General findings. Reflux esophagitis in the association with hiatal hernia on the third place in the structure of gastroenterological diseases. The development of minimally invasive surgical technologies has led to an increase in the number of laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations. The literature review includes 12 studies, the results of which were published from 2002 to 2020, with a total number of patients 1633. In most of them, when comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations, the advantages of one or another technique were not revealed. In some studies, the high cost and duration of the operation were noted when using the da Vinci robotic surgical complex. Other studies have reported possible improvements in the treatment outcomes of patients with large or recurrent hiatal hernias due to the high precision of movement and improved visualization characteristic of therobot-assisted surgeries.Conclusion. It is necessary to conduct more researches on this problem to develop indications for the choice of a particular surgical approach, as well as to create a single transparent algorithm for the surgical treatment of patients with reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia.","PeriodicalId":33798,"journal":{"name":"Rossiiskii zhurnal gastroenterologii gepatologii koloproktologii","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossiiskii zhurnal gastroenterologii gepatologii koloproktologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-1-15-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations.General findings. Reflux esophagitis in the association with hiatal hernia on the third place in the structure of gastroenterological diseases. The development of minimally invasive surgical technologies has led to an increase in the number of laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations. The literature review includes 12 studies, the results of which were published from 2002 to 2020, with a total number of patients 1633. In most of them, when comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted anti-reflux operations, the advantages of one or another technique were not revealed. In some studies, the high cost and duration of the operation were noted when using the da Vinci robotic surgical complex. Other studies have reported possible improvements in the treatment outcomes of patients with large or recurrent hiatal hernias due to the high precision of movement and improved visualization characteristic of therobot-assisted surgeries.Conclusion. It is necessary to conduct more researches on this problem to develop indications for the choice of a particular surgical approach, as well as to create a single transparent algorithm for the surgical treatment of patients with reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia.
裂孔疝手术:腹腔镜手术还是机器人手术?
的目标。评估腹腔镜和机器人辅助抗反流手术的优缺点。一般的发现。反流性食管炎在与食道裂孔疝相关的结构胃病中居第三位。微创手术技术的发展导致腹腔镜和机器人辅助的抗反流手术数量的增加。文献综述包括12项研究,研究结果发表于2002 - 2020年,共纳入患者1633例。在大多数研究中,当比较腹腔镜和机器人辅助的抗反流手术时,并没有显示出其中一种技术的优势。在一些研究中,当使用达芬奇机器人手术综合体时,注意到手术的高成本和持续时间。其他研究报道,由于机器人辅助手术的高精度运动和改进的可视化特性,可能改善大裂孔疝或复发性裂孔疝患者的治疗结果。有必要对此问题进行更多的研究,以确定选择特定手术入路的指征,并为反流性食管炎和裂孔疝患者的手术治疗创建一个单一透明的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信