Household Socioeconomic Determinants of Clean Cooking Program in Ecuador

IF 3.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Daniel Davi-Arderius, Moisés Obaco, R. Alvarado
{"title":"Household Socioeconomic Determinants of Clean Cooking Program in Ecuador","authors":"Daniel Davi-Arderius, Moisés Obaco, R. Alvarado","doi":"10.1080/15567249.2022.2160525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ecuador is a developing South American country that has highly subsidized liquid petroleum gas (LPG) since 1974. Between 2015 and 2020, LPG subsidies amounted to 260 M USD annually. In 2014, the Ecuadorean government implemented a clean cooking program, to encourage the replacement of LPG with electricity, mainly through induction stoves. However, the engagement rate in this program was lower than initially expected. This work investigates the socioeconomic and sociodemographic determinants of using various cooking technologies in Ecuador, including induction stoves. We use official Ecuadorian household surveys from 2015 to 2017 to gather information on gender, age, marital status, educational level, ethnicity, income family, family size, urban area, and province of residence. We then perform two econometric analyses, one using a probit model to study the determinants of having an induction stove, and the other employing a multilogit model to investigate the sociodemographic characteristics associated with the use of different cooking technologies, namely LPG, firewood, and electricity. Our results indicate that non-married individuals, Indigenous people, the poor, and those living in rooms or apartments with poor housing conditions show the lowest likelihood of having an induction stove. Moreover, the most disadvantaged groups still prefer firewood instead of the highly subsidized LPG barrels. We also find important differences across provinces. Our results give rise to several policy recommendations. Clean cooking programs should have a more regional approach and consider specific subsidies for the most disadvantaged groups. Moreover, the successful implementation of clean cooking programs may require the implementation of specific social programs targeting households that still use firewood. Otherwise, these clean cooking programs may become regressive and only benefit the wealthier households.","PeriodicalId":51247,"journal":{"name":"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy","volume":"PP 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2022.2160525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ecuador is a developing South American country that has highly subsidized liquid petroleum gas (LPG) since 1974. Between 2015 and 2020, LPG subsidies amounted to 260 M USD annually. In 2014, the Ecuadorean government implemented a clean cooking program, to encourage the replacement of LPG with electricity, mainly through induction stoves. However, the engagement rate in this program was lower than initially expected. This work investigates the socioeconomic and sociodemographic determinants of using various cooking technologies in Ecuador, including induction stoves. We use official Ecuadorian household surveys from 2015 to 2017 to gather information on gender, age, marital status, educational level, ethnicity, income family, family size, urban area, and province of residence. We then perform two econometric analyses, one using a probit model to study the determinants of having an induction stove, and the other employing a multilogit model to investigate the sociodemographic characteristics associated with the use of different cooking technologies, namely LPG, firewood, and electricity. Our results indicate that non-married individuals, Indigenous people, the poor, and those living in rooms or apartments with poor housing conditions show the lowest likelihood of having an induction stove. Moreover, the most disadvantaged groups still prefer firewood instead of the highly subsidized LPG barrels. We also find important differences across provinces. Our results give rise to several policy recommendations. Clean cooking programs should have a more regional approach and consider specific subsidies for the most disadvantaged groups. Moreover, the successful implementation of clean cooking programs may require the implementation of specific social programs targeting households that still use firewood. Otherwise, these clean cooking programs may become regressive and only benefit the wealthier households.
厄瓜多尔清洁烹饪计划的家庭社会经济决定因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
12.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: 12 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: Applied Science & Technology Index; API Abstracts/Literature; Automatic Subject Index Citation; BIOSIS Previews; Cabell’s Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Economics and Finance; Chemical Abstracts; CSA Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts; CSA Environmental Sciences & Pollution Management Database; CSA Pollution Abstracts; Current Contents/Engineering, Technology & Applied Sciences; Directory of Industry Data Sources; Economic Abstracts; Electrical and Electronics Abstracts; Energy Information Abstracts; Energy Research Abstracts; Engineering Index Monthly; Environmental Abstracts; Environmental Periodicals Bibliography (EPB); International Abstracts in Operations Research; Operations/Research/Management Science Abstracts; Petroleum Abstracts; Physikalische Berichte; and Science Citation Index. Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信