Trends in Security Product Evaluations

Q4 Social Sciences
Richard E. Smith
{"title":"Trends in Security Product Evaluations","authors":"Richard E. Smith","doi":"10.1080/10658980701576404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Government-endorsed security evaluations, like those performed under the Common Criteria (CC), use established techniques of software quality assurance to try to evaluate product security. Despite high costs and disputed benefits, the number of evaluated products has grown dramatically since 2001, doubling between 2003 and 2005 and leaping again in 2006. Using details from more than 860 security evaluations, this paper looks at the types of products evaluated, the “assurance levels” achieved, where the evaluations occur, and ongoing participation by product vendors. These observations are combined with other lessons learned to make recommendations on product evaluation strategies.","PeriodicalId":36738,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Systems Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Systems Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10658980701576404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Government-endorsed security evaluations, like those performed under the Common Criteria (CC), use established techniques of software quality assurance to try to evaluate product security. Despite high costs and disputed benefits, the number of evaluated products has grown dramatically since 2001, doubling between 2003 and 2005 and leaping again in 2006. Using details from more than 860 security evaluations, this paper looks at the types of products evaluated, the “assurance levels” achieved, where the evaluations occur, and ongoing participation by product vendors. These observations are combined with other lessons learned to make recommendations on product evaluation strategies.
安全产品评估的趋势
政府认可的安全评估,就像那些在通用标准(CC)下执行的评估一样,使用已建立的软件质量保证技术来尝试评估产品安全性。尽管成本高,效益也有争议,但自2001年以来,接受评估的产品数量大幅增长,2003年至2005年期间翻了一番,2006年再次大幅增长。本文使用860多个安全评估的细节,研究了评估的产品类型、达到的“保证级别”、评估发生的位置以及产品供应商的持续参与。将这些观察结果与其他经验教训结合起来,就产品评价战略提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Information Systems Security
Journal of Information Systems Security Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信