The Closure Non Closure of the Parietal Peritoneum in the Caeserean Section

N. Gultekin
{"title":"The Closure Non Closure of the Parietal Peritoneum in the Caeserean Section","authors":"N. Gultekin","doi":"10.4172/2161-0932.1000439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Was the operation time of the second caesarean section affected from the technics of the operation in the first caesarean section. \nObjectives: We estimated that the operation time in the second caesarean section would be more longer by non-closing of the parietal peritoneum than the closure. Firstly, the non-closure of the parietal peritoneum was seemed to gain time during the first caesarean section. However we compared the operation time of the second caesarean section of non-closure and closure. \nStudy design: This was a retrospective study. The study had two groups of the second caesarean sections of patients who had closure and non- closure of parietal peritoneum in the first caesarean section. The closure of pariatel peritoneum was control group with 1308 patients and the non-closure of any peritoneum was case group with 740 patients. In the both groups, the operation time and the amount of the adhesions of the omentum to the scarpa fascia were compared. \nResult: The nonclosure of the parietal peritoneum may gain time during the first operation but the nonclosure will casues the more adhesions of omentum to the scarpa fascia and the time of the second repeated caesarean will be longer. For this reason , the recover in second operation will be late in non- closure patients. \nConclusion: This study was very important experiment about operation tehcniques with doing the second operation to the same patients. This study should be done in multiple centers with more number of patients in the World.","PeriodicalId":22164,"journal":{"name":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics","volume":"AES-14 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0932.1000439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Was the operation time of the second caesarean section affected from the technics of the operation in the first caesarean section. Objectives: We estimated that the operation time in the second caesarean section would be more longer by non-closing of the parietal peritoneum than the closure. Firstly, the non-closure of the parietal peritoneum was seemed to gain time during the first caesarean section. However we compared the operation time of the second caesarean section of non-closure and closure. Study design: This was a retrospective study. The study had two groups of the second caesarean sections of patients who had closure and non- closure of parietal peritoneum in the first caesarean section. The closure of pariatel peritoneum was control group with 1308 patients and the non-closure of any peritoneum was case group with 740 patients. In the both groups, the operation time and the amount of the adhesions of the omentum to the scarpa fascia were compared. Result: The nonclosure of the parietal peritoneum may gain time during the first operation but the nonclosure will casues the more adhesions of omentum to the scarpa fascia and the time of the second repeated caesarean will be longer. For this reason , the recover in second operation will be late in non- closure patients. Conclusion: This study was very important experiment about operation tehcniques with doing the second operation to the same patients. This study should be done in multiple centers with more number of patients in the World.
剖宫产术中腹膜壁未闭合
背景:第二次剖宫产手术时间是否受第一次剖宫产手术工艺的影响?目的:我们估计第二次剖宫产术中不闭合腹膜比闭合腹膜的手术时间更长。首先,在第一次剖宫产术中,腹膜壁未闭合似乎获得了时间。然而,我们比较了第二次剖宫产术不缝合与缝合的手术时间。研究设计:这是一项回顾性研究。本研究有两组第二次剖宫产的患者在第一次剖宫产中有闭合和未闭合的腹膜顶。围腹膜闭合为对照组1308例,任意腹膜不闭合为病例组740例。比较两组手术时间及大网膜与斯卡帕筋膜粘连程度。结果:腹膜壁不闭合可在第一次手术中获得时间,但不闭合会使网膜粘连更多,第二次重复剖宫产的时间更长。因此,非闭合性患者第二次手术恢复较晚。结论:本研究是对同一患者进行二次手术的手术技术的重要实验。这项研究应该在世界上多个中心和更多的患者中进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信