External quality-assurance results for the National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network, 1997-99

J. D. Gordon, N. Latysh, Sandy J. Lindholm
{"title":"External quality-assurance results for the National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network, 1997-99","authors":"J. D. Gordon, N. Latysh, Sandy J. Lindholm","doi":"10.3133/WRI034027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Five external quality-assurance programs were operated by the U.S. Geological Survey for the National Atmospheric Deposition Program/ National Trends Network (NADP/NTN) during 1997 through 1999: the intersite-comparison program, the blind-audit program, the fieldaudit program, the interlaboratory-comparison program, and the collocated-sampler program. The intersite-comparison program assesses the accuracy of pH and specific-conductance determinations made by NADP/NTN site operators. In two 1997 intersite-comparison studies, 83.7 and 85.8 percent of the pH determinations met the NADP/NTN accuracy goals, whereas 97.3 and 92.4 percent of the specific-conductance determinations met the NADP/NTN accuracy goals. The percentage of pH and specific-conductance determinations that met the accuracy goals in 1998 were, for the most part, higher than in 1997. In two 1998 studies, 90.9 and 90.3 percent of the pH determinations met the accuracy goals compared to 94.7 and 96.0 percent of the specificconductance measurements meeting the accuracy goals. In one 1999 intersite-comparison study, 89.5 percent and 99.4 percent of pH and specificconductance determinations, respectively, met the NADP/NTN accuracy goals. The blind-audit program evaluates the effects of routine sample handling, processing, and shipping on the analytical bias and precision of weekly precipitation samples. A portion of the blind-audit sample subject to the normal onsite handling and processing of a weekly precipitation sample is referred to as the bucket portion, whereas the portion receiving only minimal handling is referred to as the bottle portion. Positive bias in regard to blind-audit results indicates that the bucket portion has a higher concentration than the bottle portion. The paired t-test for the 1997 through 1999 blindaudit data indicates that routine sample handling, processing, and shipping introduced a positive bias (α=0.05) for calcium and chloride and a negative bias (α=0.05) for hydrogen ion. During 1997 through 1999, the median paired differences between the bucket and bottle portions ranged from 0.00 milligram per liter for nitrate and ammonium to +0.010 milligram per liter for both chloride and sulfate. The median paired difference between the bucket and bottle portions for hydrogen ion was –1.086 microequivalents per liter, whereas for specific conductance, the median paired difference between the bucket and bottle portions was –0.200 microsiemen per centimeter during 1997 through 1999. Surface-chemistry effects due to variable amounts of precipitation contacting prewashed sample-collection and shipping-container surfaces were studied in the blind-audit program by using three different sample volumes. The samplecollection and shipping containers used for the blind-audit study were obtained from the site operator’s supply and could have been used for precipitation samples. Results of a Kruskal-Wallis","PeriodicalId":23603,"journal":{"name":"Water-Resources Investigations Report","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water-Resources Investigations Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3133/WRI034027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Five external quality-assurance programs were operated by the U.S. Geological Survey for the National Atmospheric Deposition Program/ National Trends Network (NADP/NTN) during 1997 through 1999: the intersite-comparison program, the blind-audit program, the fieldaudit program, the interlaboratory-comparison program, and the collocated-sampler program. The intersite-comparison program assesses the accuracy of pH and specific-conductance determinations made by NADP/NTN site operators. In two 1997 intersite-comparison studies, 83.7 and 85.8 percent of the pH determinations met the NADP/NTN accuracy goals, whereas 97.3 and 92.4 percent of the specific-conductance determinations met the NADP/NTN accuracy goals. The percentage of pH and specific-conductance determinations that met the accuracy goals in 1998 were, for the most part, higher than in 1997. In two 1998 studies, 90.9 and 90.3 percent of the pH determinations met the accuracy goals compared to 94.7 and 96.0 percent of the specificconductance measurements meeting the accuracy goals. In one 1999 intersite-comparison study, 89.5 percent and 99.4 percent of pH and specificconductance determinations, respectively, met the NADP/NTN accuracy goals. The blind-audit program evaluates the effects of routine sample handling, processing, and shipping on the analytical bias and precision of weekly precipitation samples. A portion of the blind-audit sample subject to the normal onsite handling and processing of a weekly precipitation sample is referred to as the bucket portion, whereas the portion receiving only minimal handling is referred to as the bottle portion. Positive bias in regard to blind-audit results indicates that the bucket portion has a higher concentration than the bottle portion. The paired t-test for the 1997 through 1999 blindaudit data indicates that routine sample handling, processing, and shipping introduced a positive bias (α=0.05) for calcium and chloride and a negative bias (α=0.05) for hydrogen ion. During 1997 through 1999, the median paired differences between the bucket and bottle portions ranged from 0.00 milligram per liter for nitrate and ammonium to +0.010 milligram per liter for both chloride and sulfate. The median paired difference between the bucket and bottle portions for hydrogen ion was –1.086 microequivalents per liter, whereas for specific conductance, the median paired difference between the bucket and bottle portions was –0.200 microsiemen per centimeter during 1997 through 1999. Surface-chemistry effects due to variable amounts of precipitation contacting prewashed sample-collection and shipping-container surfaces were studied in the blind-audit program by using three different sample volumes. The samplecollection and shipping containers used for the blind-audit study were obtained from the site operator’s supply and could have been used for precipitation samples. Results of a Kruskal-Wallis
1997-99年国家大气沉降方案/国家趋势网络的外部质量保证结果
从1997年到1999年,美国地质调查局为国家大气沉积计划/国家趋势网络(NADP/NTN)开展了5个外部质量保证项目:站点间比较项目、盲审项目、实地审计项目、实验室间比较项目和组合采样项目。位点间比较程序评估NADP/NTN位点操作员测定pH和特异电导的准确性。在1997年的两项站点间比较研究中,83.7%和85.8%的pH测定符合NADP/NTN的准确性目标,而97.3%和92.4%的特异电导测定符合NADP/NTN的准确性目标。在大多数情况下,1998年pH值和比电导测定的准确度比1997年高。在1998年的两项研究中,90.9%和90.3%的pH值测定符合准确性目标,而94.7%和96.0%的特定电导测量符合准确性目标。在1999年的一项站点间比较研究中,分别有89.5%和99.4%的pH和特异电导测定达到了NADP/NTN的准确性目标。盲审程序评估常规样品处理、处理和运输对每周沉淀样品的分析偏差和精度的影响。盲审计样本中需要现场正常处理和处理一周沉淀样本的部分被称为桶部分,而只接受最少处理的部分被称为瓶部分。关于盲审计结果的正偏差表明桶部分的浓度高于瓶部分。1997年至1999年盲审计数据的配对t检验表明,常规样品处理、加工和运输对钙和氯离子产生了正偏倚(α=0.05),对氢离子产生了负偏倚(α=0.05)。从1997年到1999年,桶装和瓶装的硝酸盐和铵含量的中位数差异为每升0.00毫克,氯化物和硫酸盐含量为每升+0.010毫克。1997年至1999年间,桶和瓶部分的氢离子配对差异中值为每升-1.086微当量,而对于特定电导,桶和瓶部分的配对差异中值为每厘米-0.200微当量。在盲审计程序中,通过使用三种不同的样品体积,研究了接触预洗样品收集和运输容器表面的不同沉淀物量的表面化学效应。用于盲审计研究的样品收集和运输容器是从现场操作员的供应中获得的,可以用于沉淀样品。Kruskal-Wallis的结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信