Measuring Safe Tackle Technique In American Youth Football: Preliminary Validation Of The Standard Assessment Of Tackle Technique Rubric

S. Dietrich
{"title":"Measuring Safe Tackle Technique In American Youth Football: Preliminary Validation Of The Standard Assessment Of Tackle Technique Rubric","authors":"S. Dietrich","doi":"10.37532/JAE.2020.9(2).329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2.8 million Youth participate in full contact football. Young players could be exposed to more than 450 head impacts per season. One out of every thirty-three youth players may suffer a concussion each season. Tackling is a complex, reactive, psychomotor skill that carries potentially lifelong, catastrophic consequences if preformed incorrectly. Proper technique at an early age is essential. Our aim is to establish reliability for the Standard Assessment of Tackling Technique (SATT) a field-based, clinical assessment tool for measuring tackle proficiency. Fifteen, healthy middle school football players between age 10 and 14 were videotaped performing the Tackling Proficiency Assessment (TPA) over three separate sessions spaced seven days apart. Two raters independently scored videos using the SATT rubric. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.707. Intrarater reliability was moderate (ICC=0.57; 95% CI: 0.23-0.83) for rater 1 and good (ICC=0.79; 95% CI: 0.55-0.93) for rater 2. ICC values for sessions 1 and 2 were good, and moderate for session 3. SATT component 4-arm rip (ICC=0.40; 95% CI: 0.31-0.51) was the least reliable component while SATT component 5-leg drive (ICC=0.95; 95% CI: 0.92-0.97) was most reliable. Composite SATT scores had moderate to good intrarater reliability for both raters. Youth athletes should demonstrate their ability to perform a tackle safely, prior to participation in full contact play. Initial results show the SATT is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool useful for evaluating basic tackle skill and identifying red flags like leading with the helmet or leaving their feet.","PeriodicalId":90574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of athletic enhancement","volume":"18 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of athletic enhancement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37532/JAE.2020.9(2).329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

2.8 million Youth participate in full contact football. Young players could be exposed to more than 450 head impacts per season. One out of every thirty-three youth players may suffer a concussion each season. Tackling is a complex, reactive, psychomotor skill that carries potentially lifelong, catastrophic consequences if preformed incorrectly. Proper technique at an early age is essential. Our aim is to establish reliability for the Standard Assessment of Tackling Technique (SATT) a field-based, clinical assessment tool for measuring tackle proficiency. Fifteen, healthy middle school football players between age 10 and 14 were videotaped performing the Tackling Proficiency Assessment (TPA) over three separate sessions spaced seven days apart. Two raters independently scored videos using the SATT rubric. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.707. Intrarater reliability was moderate (ICC=0.57; 95% CI: 0.23-0.83) for rater 1 and good (ICC=0.79; 95% CI: 0.55-0.93) for rater 2. ICC values for sessions 1 and 2 were good, and moderate for session 3. SATT component 4-arm rip (ICC=0.40; 95% CI: 0.31-0.51) was the least reliable component while SATT component 5-leg drive (ICC=0.95; 95% CI: 0.92-0.97) was most reliable. Composite SATT scores had moderate to good intrarater reliability for both raters. Youth athletes should demonstrate their ability to perform a tackle safely, prior to participation in full contact play. Initial results show the SATT is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool useful for evaluating basic tackle skill and identifying red flags like leading with the helmet or leaving their feet.
美国青少年足球安全铲球技术的测量:铲球技术指标标准评定的初步验证
280万青少年参加了全面接触式足球。年轻球员每个赛季可能会受到450多次头部撞击。每33名年轻球员中就有1人在每个赛季遭受脑震荡。铲球是一项复杂的、反应性的、精神运动的技能,如果操作不当,可能会带来终身的灾难性后果。在早期适当的技巧是必不可少的。我们的目标是为铲球技术标准评估(SATT)建立可靠性,这是一种基于现场的临床评估工具,用于测量铲球能力。15名年龄在10到14岁之间的健康的中学足球运动员在三个独立的时段中进行了铲球能力评估(TPA),间隔7天。两名评分员分别使用sat评分标准对视频进行评分。Cronbach’s alpha为0.707。内部信度中等(ICC=0.57;评分1和良好的95% CI: 0.23-0.83) (ICC=0.79;95% CI: 0.55-0.93)。会话1和会话2的ICC值为良好,会话3的ICC值为中等。SATT分量4臂撕裂(ICC=0.40;95% CI: 0.31-0.51)是最不可靠的成分,而SATT成分5腿驱动(ICC=0.95;95% CI: 0.92-0.97)最可靠。两个评价者的综合sat分数具有中等到良好的内部信度。青少年运动员在参加全面接触比赛之前,应该展示他们安全铲球的能力。初步结果表明,SATT是一种有效可靠的临床评估工具,可用于评估基本铲球技能和识别危险信号,如戴头盔或离开脚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信