Effects of a Cognitive Distraction Task on Gait Mechanics in Recently Gait-Retrained Runners

Futrell Erin E., Reisman Darcy S., Mullineaux David R, Davis Irene S.
{"title":"Effects of a Cognitive Distraction Task on Gait Mechanics in Recently Gait-Retrained Runners","authors":"Futrell Erin E., Reisman Darcy S., Mullineaux David R, Davis Irene S.","doi":"10.23937/2469-5718/1510215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: When assessing running mechanics in a laboratory setting, there is risk for performance bias by the participants. The purpose of this study was to determine if runners who had recently undergone gait retraining altered their running mechanics while performing a cognitive distraction task. Methods: Two groups of runners were analyzed at 3 postintervention time-points for changes in vertical loadrates, cadence, and footstrike pattern. Results: Runners who received cadence retraining (CAD) did not alter cadence, but had increased loadrates when distracted. Runners who received footstrike retraining (FFS) did not alter foot angle or loadrates while distracted. However, both increases and decreases were found in cadence and foot angle in response to distraction. Conclusions: Utilizing a distraction task with gait analyses, especially post-gait retraining, is feasible and recommended.","PeriodicalId":91298,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports and exercise medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports and exercise medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5718/1510215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When assessing running mechanics in a laboratory setting, there is risk for performance bias by the participants. The purpose of this study was to determine if runners who had recently undergone gait retraining altered their running mechanics while performing a cognitive distraction task. Methods: Two groups of runners were analyzed at 3 postintervention time-points for changes in vertical loadrates, cadence, and footstrike pattern. Results: Runners who received cadence retraining (CAD) did not alter cadence, but had increased loadrates when distracted. Runners who received footstrike retraining (FFS) did not alter foot angle or loadrates while distracted. However, both increases and decreases were found in cadence and foot angle in response to distraction. Conclusions: Utilizing a distraction task with gait analyses, especially post-gait retraining, is feasible and recommended.
认知分心任务对新近进行步态再训练的跑步者步态力学的影响
背景:在实验室环境中评估跑步力学时,参与者存在表现偏差的风险。这项研究的目的是确定最近接受过步态再训练的跑步者在执行认知分心任务时是否改变了他们的跑步机制。方法:在干预后的3个时间点分析两组跑步者的垂直负荷率、节奏和步法的变化。结果:接受节奏再训练(CAD)的跑步者没有改变节奏,但在分心时负荷率增加。接受步法再训练(FFS)的跑步者在分心时不会改变脚的角度或负荷率。然而,在注意力分散的情况下,节奏和足角都有所增加和减少。结论:在步态分析中使用分心任务,特别是步态后再训练,是可行的,值得推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信