A “Stranger” Researching Narratives in Southern Slovakia: Hungarian Minority Research by an Anthropologist Who Is Not “At Home”

Yuko Kambara
{"title":"A “Stranger” Researching Narratives in Southern Slovakia: Hungarian Minority Research by an Anthropologist Who Is Not “At Home”","authors":"Yuko Kambara","doi":"10.1515/aussoc-2017-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper considers methodological questions regarding cultural/social anthropological research in multiethnic fields. Specifically, I attempt to reconsider the possibility of anthropological research by a “stranger” based on a research that I—a Japanese anthropologist—conducted in southern Slovakia. Anthropology originally developed as the study of other cultures; in some European countries, however, most anthropological research is conducted by anthropologists who are “at home”. For Slovak and Hungarian researchers, the Hungarian minority has been a common research target; therefore, many inhabitants, both ethnic Hungarians and Slovaks, have already experienced social research as subjects. Some interviewees get use to present a narrative expressing how they think about a certain topic. This research condition points to a fundamental question in the interviews of anthropological research. In this paper, therefore, my research experience is described to analyze reflexively my research position in the field. In fact, it is difficult to theoretically define the boundary between “at home” and “stranger”; the difference depends on the context of each study. Anthropologists need to interpret their narratives by considering the results of participant observation and reflexivity in the research. “Stranger” anthropologists might have the advantage of noticing informants’ reflexivity in their narratives. This discussion can, in turn, become part of an ongoing process by which inhabitants’ interactions with researchers create new master narratives in the field.","PeriodicalId":30433,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Social Analysis","volume":"13 1","pages":"21 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Social Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/aussoc-2017-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper considers methodological questions regarding cultural/social anthropological research in multiethnic fields. Specifically, I attempt to reconsider the possibility of anthropological research by a “stranger” based on a research that I—a Japanese anthropologist—conducted in southern Slovakia. Anthropology originally developed as the study of other cultures; in some European countries, however, most anthropological research is conducted by anthropologists who are “at home”. For Slovak and Hungarian researchers, the Hungarian minority has been a common research target; therefore, many inhabitants, both ethnic Hungarians and Slovaks, have already experienced social research as subjects. Some interviewees get use to present a narrative expressing how they think about a certain topic. This research condition points to a fundamental question in the interviews of anthropological research. In this paper, therefore, my research experience is described to analyze reflexively my research position in the field. In fact, it is difficult to theoretically define the boundary between “at home” and “stranger”; the difference depends on the context of each study. Anthropologists need to interpret their narratives by considering the results of participant observation and reflexivity in the research. “Stranger” anthropologists might have the advantage of noticing informants’ reflexivity in their narratives. This discussion can, in turn, become part of an ongoing process by which inhabitants’ interactions with researchers create new master narratives in the field.
一个“陌生人”在斯洛伐克南部研究叙事:一位不“在家”的人类学家对匈牙利少数民族的研究
摘要本文探讨了多民族领域文化/社会人类学研究的方法论问题。具体来说,我试图重新考虑一个“陌生人”在斯洛伐克南部进行人类学研究的可能性,这是基于我——一个日本人类学家——在斯洛伐克南部进行的一项研究。人类学最初是作为对其他文化的研究而发展起来的;然而,在一些欧洲国家,大多数人类学研究都是由“在家”的人类学家进行的。对于斯洛伐克和匈牙利的研究人员来说,匈牙利少数民族一直是一个共同的研究对象;因此,许多居民,无论是匈牙利人还是斯洛伐克人,都已经经历过作为研究对象的社会研究。一些受访者习惯于用叙述的方式来表达他们对某个话题的看法。这种研究状况指出了人类学研究访谈中的一个基本问题。因此,本文对我的研究经历进行了描述,以反思性地分析我在该领域的研究地位。事实上,从理论上很难界定“在家”和“陌生人”之间的界限;这种差异取决于每项研究的背景。人类学家需要通过考虑研究中的参与性观察和反身性的结果来解释他们的叙述。“陌生人”人类学家可能有一个优势,那就是注意到告密者在叙述中的反身性。反过来,这种讨论可以成为一个持续过程的一部分,通过居民与研究人员的互动,在该领域创造新的主叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信