Effects of Yucca schidigera Based Feed Additive on In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility, Efficiency of Microbial Production, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Four Dairy Diets

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
U. Anele, Xavier Crumel, Lydia K. Olagunju, D. P. Compart
{"title":"Effects of Yucca schidigera Based Feed Additive on In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility, Efficiency of Microbial Production, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Four Dairy Diets","authors":"U. Anele, Xavier Crumel, Lydia K. Olagunju, D. P. Compart","doi":"10.3390/dairy3020025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study evaluated the effects of a feed additive (synthesized from Yucca schidigera) on some fermentation variables. In the first of two experiments, seven concentrations of the feed additive were evaluated using the in vitro batch culture technique to determine the optimum dose to use in the second experiment. The substrates used were a total mixed ration (TMR) and alfalfa hay. The levels of inclusion were 0 (control), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 g/head/d. After this initial evaluation, 2 g/head/d was selected for the second experiment. For the second study, four dietary substrates (two corn silages and two TMR; collected from different dairy farms in the Piedmont, North Carolina, area) were used. Incubation times were 3, 6, and 24 h and treatments were 0 (control) and 2 g/head/d of the feed additive. Inclusion of the feed additive did not affect (p > 0.05) in vitro dry matter disappearance. Additionally, the feed additive had no effect (p > 0.05) on short-chain fatty acid concentrations, microbial mass, and efficiency of microbial production. Methane production was reduced by 22.7% with feed additive inclusion. Similarly, lower (p = 0.013; 18%) carbon dioxide concentration was observed in the feed additive treatment. Ammonia and hydrogen sulfite concentrations were similar (p > 0.05) for both treatments. Inclusion of the feed additive at 2 g/head/d decreased methane and carbon dioxide concentrations in most of the diets. The energy saved by reducing the amount of methane produced was not partitioned into valuable products such as short-chain fatty acids and microbial mass.","PeriodicalId":11001,"journal":{"name":"Dairy Science & Technology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dairy Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy3020025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study evaluated the effects of a feed additive (synthesized from Yucca schidigera) on some fermentation variables. In the first of two experiments, seven concentrations of the feed additive were evaluated using the in vitro batch culture technique to determine the optimum dose to use in the second experiment. The substrates used were a total mixed ration (TMR) and alfalfa hay. The levels of inclusion were 0 (control), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 g/head/d. After this initial evaluation, 2 g/head/d was selected for the second experiment. For the second study, four dietary substrates (two corn silages and two TMR; collected from different dairy farms in the Piedmont, North Carolina, area) were used. Incubation times were 3, 6, and 24 h and treatments were 0 (control) and 2 g/head/d of the feed additive. Inclusion of the feed additive did not affect (p > 0.05) in vitro dry matter disappearance. Additionally, the feed additive had no effect (p > 0.05) on short-chain fatty acid concentrations, microbial mass, and efficiency of microbial production. Methane production was reduced by 22.7% with feed additive inclusion. Similarly, lower (p = 0.013; 18%) carbon dioxide concentration was observed in the feed additive treatment. Ammonia and hydrogen sulfite concentrations were similar (p > 0.05) for both treatments. Inclusion of the feed additive at 2 g/head/d decreased methane and carbon dioxide concentrations in most of the diets. The energy saved by reducing the amount of methane produced was not partitioned into valuable products such as short-chain fatty acids and microbial mass.
丝兰基饲料添加剂对4种奶牛日粮干物质体外消化率、微生物生产效率和温室气体排放的影响
研究了一种以丝兰为原料合成的饲料添加剂对几种发酵指标的影响。在第一个实验中,采用体外分批培养技术对7种饲料添加剂浓度进行了评估,以确定第二个实验的最佳剂量。试验底物为全混合日粮(TMR)和苜蓿干草。纳入水平分别为0(对照)、0.5、1、2、4、6和8 g/头/d。初步评价后,选择2 g/头/d进行第二次试验。第二项试验采用4种饲粮基质(2种玉米青贮和2种TMR;收集自北卡罗莱纳州皮埃蒙特地区的不同奶牛场)。孵育时间分别为3、6和24 h,添加量分别为0(对照)和2 g/头/d。添加饲料添加剂对体外干物质消失无显著影响(p > 0.05)。此外,饲料添加剂对短链脂肪酸浓度、微生物质量和微生物生产效率无显著影响(p > 0.05)。添加饲料添加剂后甲烷产量降低22.7%。同样,较低(p = 0.013;在饲料添加剂处理中,二氧化碳浓度为18%。两种处理的氨和亚硫酸氢浓度相近(p > 0.05)。在大多数日粮中添加2 g/头/d的饲料添加剂可降低甲烷和二氧化碳浓度。减少甲烷产量所节省的能源没有被分配到有价值的产品,如短链脂肪酸和微生物质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dairy Science & Technology
Dairy Science & Technology 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信