Veracity Appraisal in the Internet Users’ Comments on the News about SARS CoV-2 Pandemic

Q2 Arts and Humanities
A. Alekseeva, Jinhua Li
{"title":"Veracity Appraisal in the Internet Users’ Comments on the News about SARS CoV-2 Pandemic","authors":"A. Alekseeva, Jinhua Li","doi":"10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-2-42-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The article is devoted to the representation of the veracity appraisal – the main type of appraisal in the Internet users’ comments on the news about the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The purpose of the paper is to investigate what linguistic means are used to represent this kind of appraisal and identify the dominant value in Russian society towards this matter. To reach this goal, we used continuous sampling technique to select 1 187 comments on posts about SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in social networks, where 116 language units containing veracity appraisal were found.Results. The analysis of the material shows the domination of negative emotionally coloured language units, mostly words with axiological semantics and evaluative metaphors. The veracity appraisal is also represented by phraseological and syntactic units. In some contexts appraisal can be intensified; in particular cases appraisal type is transformed or concretized by the addition of another type to the basic one.Conclusion. The value dominant of the Russian society regarding the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is the veracity of information, proofs that can confirm the official statements, and real scientific data. The dominant attitude to the received information is distrust which leads to somewhat intense aggression.","PeriodicalId":36462,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Novosibirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriya: Istoriya, Filologiya","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Novosibirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriya: Istoriya, Filologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-2-42-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The article is devoted to the representation of the veracity appraisal – the main type of appraisal in the Internet users’ comments on the news about the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The purpose of the paper is to investigate what linguistic means are used to represent this kind of appraisal and identify the dominant value in Russian society towards this matter. To reach this goal, we used continuous sampling technique to select 1 187 comments on posts about SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in social networks, where 116 language units containing veracity appraisal were found.Results. The analysis of the material shows the domination of negative emotionally coloured language units, mostly words with axiological semantics and evaluative metaphors. The veracity appraisal is also represented by phraseological and syntactic units. In some contexts appraisal can be intensified; in particular cases appraisal type is transformed or concretized by the addition of another type to the basic one.Conclusion. The value dominant of the Russian society regarding the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is the veracity of information, proofs that can confirm the official statements, and real scientific data. The dominant attitude to the received information is distrust which leads to somewhat intense aggression.
互联网用户对SARS - CoV-2大流行新闻评论的真实性评估
目的。本文探讨了网民对新冠肺炎疫情新闻评论中最主要的评价类型——真实性评价的表征。本文的目的是研究用什么语言手段来表达这种评价,并确定俄罗斯社会对这一问题的主导价值。为了达到这一目标,我们采用连续抽样技术,在社交网络上选择了1187条关于SARS-CoV-2大流行的帖子评论,其中发现116个包含准确性评价的语言单位。对材料的分析表明,消极情感色彩的语言单位占主导地位,主要是具有价值论语义和评价隐喻的词语。准确性评价也由短语和句法单位来表示。在某些情况下,评价可以加强;在特殊情况下,通过在基本评价类型的基础上增加另一种评价类型来转化或具体化评价类型。关于新冠肺炎疫情,俄罗斯社会的主流价值观是信息的真实性、能够证实官方说法的证据、真实的科学数据。对接收到的信息的主要态度是不信任,这会导致某种程度的强烈攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信