The pattern of socio-economic segregation between schools in England 1989 to 2021: The pupil premium, Universal Credit, and Covid-19 eras

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. Gorard
{"title":"The pattern of socio-economic segregation between schools in England 1989 to 2021: The pupil premium, Universal Credit, and Covid-19 eras","authors":"S. Gorard","doi":"10.1177/00345237231179854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an analysis of the extent to which poor pupils in England are clustered in schools with others like them. It is based on a segregation index of pupils eligible for free school meals for every year for which official national data is available. The trend over time has been published before up to 2019, and this paper extends the analysis to 2021, covering both the Covid-19 era so far and the beginning of transitional arrangements for Universal Credit, which have led to a substantial increase in the number of pupils eligible for free school meals. Results show that the segregation of poor pupils between secondary schools has continued to decline annually – a decline that started with the onset of Pupil Premium funding. This decline in segregation has not occurred for other possible indicators of disadvantage, such as pupils having a special educational need or disability, which are not addressed by Pupil Premium funding. Clustering disadvantaged pupils together in parts of a national school system has been linked to worse pupil outcomes overall, lower aspirations, less ethnic cohesion, and reduced trust in society by students. So, this ongoing reduction is encouraging, and is likely to lead to a lower poverty attainment gap in academic outcomes. However, the reduction in 2020 and 2021 is “false” to some extent, based mostly on a sudden increase in the number of pupils officially classed as poor, rather than an improvement in their distribution or evenness. It is, therefore, important to retain Pupil Premium funding or something like it for the time being to see what happens to the attainment gap. And the apparent success of this funding scheme could have implications for school systems worldwide that value fairness in the provision of national opportunities for education.","PeriodicalId":45813,"journal":{"name":"Research in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237231179854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the extent to which poor pupils in England are clustered in schools with others like them. It is based on a segregation index of pupils eligible for free school meals for every year for which official national data is available. The trend over time has been published before up to 2019, and this paper extends the analysis to 2021, covering both the Covid-19 era so far and the beginning of transitional arrangements for Universal Credit, which have led to a substantial increase in the number of pupils eligible for free school meals. Results show that the segregation of poor pupils between secondary schools has continued to decline annually – a decline that started with the onset of Pupil Premium funding. This decline in segregation has not occurred for other possible indicators of disadvantage, such as pupils having a special educational need or disability, which are not addressed by Pupil Premium funding. Clustering disadvantaged pupils together in parts of a national school system has been linked to worse pupil outcomes overall, lower aspirations, less ethnic cohesion, and reduced trust in society by students. So, this ongoing reduction is encouraging, and is likely to lead to a lower poverty attainment gap in academic outcomes. However, the reduction in 2020 and 2021 is “false” to some extent, based mostly on a sudden increase in the number of pupils officially classed as poor, rather than an improvement in their distribution or evenness. It is, therefore, important to retain Pupil Premium funding or something like it for the time being to see what happens to the attainment gap. And the apparent success of this funding scheme could have implications for school systems worldwide that value fairness in the provision of national opportunities for education.
1989年至2021年英国学校之间的社会经济隔离模式:学生溢价、普遍学分和Covid-19时代
这篇论文分析了英国贫困学生与其他像他们一样的学生聚集在同一所学校的程度。它是根据每年有资格获得免费校餐的学生的隔离指数得出的,官方数据是可以获得的。这一趋势在2019年之前就已经公布了,本文将分析扩展到2021年,涵盖了到目前为止的Covid-19时代和通用信贷过渡安排的开始,这导致有资格享受免费校餐的学生人数大幅增加。结果显示,贫困学生在中学之间的隔离现象每年都在持续下降——这种下降始于“学生津贴”基金的启动。对于其他可能的不利指标,例如有特殊教育需要或残疾的学生,隔离现象并未出现这种下降,这些学生津贴资金没有解决。在国家学校系统的某些部分,将弱势学生聚集在一起,会导致学生的总体成绩变差、抱负降低、种族凝聚力减弱以及学生对社会的信任度降低。因此,这种持续的减少是令人鼓舞的,并且可能导致学业成绩上的贫困成就差距缩小。然而,2020年和2021年的减少在某种程度上是“错误的”,主要是基于官方划分为贫困的学生数量的突然增加,而不是他们的分布或均匀性的改善。因此,重要的是暂时保留“学生津贴”或类似的资助,看看成绩差距会发生什么变化。这一资助计划的明显成功可能会对世界各地重视公平提供国家教育机会的学校系统产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Education
Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Research in Education has an established focus on the sociology and psychology of education and gives increased emphasis to current practical issues of direct interest to those in the teaching profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信