Priorities in integrating primary and secondary care: a multimethod study of GPs

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
S. Dunlea, G. McCombe, J. Broughan, Áine Carroll, R. Fawsitt, J. Gallagher, Kyle Melin, W. Cullen
{"title":"Priorities in integrating primary and secondary care: a multimethod study of GPs","authors":"S. Dunlea, G. McCombe, J. Broughan, Áine Carroll, R. Fawsitt, J. Gallagher, Kyle Melin, W. Cullen","doi":"10.1108/jica-06-2022-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThroughout the world, healthcare policy has committed to delivering integrated models of care. The interface between primary–secondary care has been identified as a particularly challenging area in this regard. To that end, this study aimed to examine the issue of integrated care from general practitioners’ (GPs) perspectives in Ireland.Design/methodology/approachThis multimethod study involved a cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews with GPs in the Ireland East region. A total of 1,274 GPs were identified from publicly available data as practising in the region, of whom the study team were able to identify 430 GPs with email addresses. An email invite was sent to 430 potential participants asking them to complete a 34-item online questionnaire and, for those who were willing, an in-depth interview was conducted with a member of the study team.FindingsIn total, 116 GPs completed the survey. Most GPs felt that enhancing integration between primary and secondary care in Ireland was a priority (n = 109, 93.9%). Five themes concerning the state of integrated care and initiatives to improve matters were identified from semi-structured interviews with 12 GPs.Originality/valueThe uniqueness of this study is that it uses a multimethod approach to provide insight into current GP views on the state of integrated care in Ireland, as well as their perspectives on how to improve integration within the Irish healthcare system.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-06-2022-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThroughout the world, healthcare policy has committed to delivering integrated models of care. The interface between primary–secondary care has been identified as a particularly challenging area in this regard. To that end, this study aimed to examine the issue of integrated care from general practitioners’ (GPs) perspectives in Ireland.Design/methodology/approachThis multimethod study involved a cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews with GPs in the Ireland East region. A total of 1,274 GPs were identified from publicly available data as practising in the region, of whom the study team were able to identify 430 GPs with email addresses. An email invite was sent to 430 potential participants asking them to complete a 34-item online questionnaire and, for those who were willing, an in-depth interview was conducted with a member of the study team.FindingsIn total, 116 GPs completed the survey. Most GPs felt that enhancing integration between primary and secondary care in Ireland was a priority (n = 109, 93.9%). Five themes concerning the state of integrated care and initiatives to improve matters were identified from semi-structured interviews with 12 GPs.Originality/valueThe uniqueness of this study is that it uses a multimethod approach to provide insight into current GP views on the state of integrated care in Ireland, as well as their perspectives on how to improve integration within the Irish healthcare system.
整合初级和二级保健的优先事项:全科医生的多方法研究
目的:在世界各地,保健政策致力于提供综合护理模式。在这方面,初级和二级保健之间的衔接已被确定为一个特别具有挑战性的领域。为此,本研究旨在从爱尔兰全科医生(gp)的角度研究综合护理问题。设计/方法/方法这项多方法研究包括对爱尔兰东部地区全科医生的横断面调查和半结构化访谈。共有1274名全科医生从公开数据中确定在该地区执业,其中研究小组能够确定430名全科医生有电子邮件地址。研究人员向430名潜在参与者发送了一封电子邮件邀请,要求他们完成一份包含34个项目的在线调查问卷,对于那些愿意的人,研究团队的一名成员对他们进行了深入采访。总共有116名全科医生完成了调查。大多数全科医生认为,加强初级和二级保健之间的整合在爱尔兰是一个优先事项(n = 109,93.9%)。从与12名全科医生的半结构化访谈中确定了有关综合护理状况和改善事项的举措的五个主题。原创性/价值本研究的独特之处在于,它使用了一种多方法的方法来提供洞察当前全科医生对爱尔兰综合护理状况的看法,以及他们对如何改善爱尔兰医疗保健系统内整合的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信