Comparison on Performance, Carcass Yield and Meat Quality Characteristics of Korean Indigenous Commercial Chicken

Kigon Kim, Jaebeom Cha, Hee-jin Kim, H. Choo, Byoungho Park, E. Hong
{"title":"Comparison on Performance, Carcass Yield and Meat Quality\n Characteristics of Korean Indigenous Commercial Chicken","authors":"Kigon Kim, Jaebeom Cha, Hee-jin Kim, H. Choo, Byoungho Park, E. Hong","doi":"10.5536/kjps.2021.48.4.277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to compare performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of 4 Korean indigenous commercial chickens (Hanhyup 3: G, Sorae 1: V, Woorimatdak 1: S, Woorimatdak 2: W). A total of 384 chickens were divided into 4 treatments with 4 Korean indigenous commercial chickens, 6 repetitions per treatment, and 16 birds per treatment (♀ 8 birds, ♂ 8 birds). For 12 weeks, body weight was significantly higher in G and V breeds than S and W breeds (P<0.01), but body weight gain lower in S breed (P<0.05). Feed conversion ratio was significantly higher in W breed at 8~10 wk of age (P<0.05). There was no significant difference on livability among four treatments. Carcass yield and fresh meat ratio were highest in V breed at 12 wk of age (P<0.05). On breast meat, shear force was lower in G breed (P<0.05), and higher in male than in female (P<0.05). Lightness (L) of breast meat was higher in female except V breed, and redness (a) was significantly higher in breed G (P<0.05). Yellowness (b) of breast meat was higher in G and V breeds, and higher in male than in female except breed G. In conclusion, G and V breeds showed superior performance, and S and W breeds showed superior meat quality. (","PeriodicalId":17845,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Poultry Science","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2021.48.4.277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of 4 Korean indigenous commercial chickens (Hanhyup 3: G, Sorae 1: V, Woorimatdak 1: S, Woorimatdak 2: W). A total of 384 chickens were divided into 4 treatments with 4 Korean indigenous commercial chickens, 6 repetitions per treatment, and 16 birds per treatment (♀ 8 birds, ♂ 8 birds). For 12 weeks, body weight was significantly higher in G and V breeds than S and W breeds (P<0.01), but body weight gain lower in S breed (P<0.05). Feed conversion ratio was significantly higher in W breed at 8~10 wk of age (P<0.05). There was no significant difference on livability among four treatments. Carcass yield and fresh meat ratio were highest in V breed at 12 wk of age (P<0.05). On breast meat, shear force was lower in G breed (P<0.05), and higher in male than in female (P<0.05). Lightness (L) of breast meat was higher in female except V breed, and redness (a) was significantly higher in breed G (P<0.05). Yellowness (b) of breast meat was higher in G and V breeds, and higher in male than in female except breed G. In conclusion, G and V breeds showed superior performance, and S and W breeds showed superior meat quality. (
韩国地方商品鸡生产性能、胴体产量及肉品质的比较
为比较4只韩国地方商品鸡(韩协3∶G、Sorae 1∶V、Woorimatdak 1∶S、Woorimatdak 2∶W)的生产性能、胴体产量和肉品质,384只鸡分为4个处理,每处理4只韩国地方商品鸡,每个处理6个重复,每个处理16只鸡(♀8只,♂8只)。试验12周,G和V品种的体重极显著高于S和W品种(P<0.01), S品种的增重低于S品种(P<0.05)。8~10周龄W品种的饲料系数显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。4个处理间的宜居性无显著差异。V品种的胴体产量和鲜肉比在12周龄最高(P<0.05)。在胸肉上,G品种的剪切力较低(P<0.05),且雄性高于雌性(P<0.05)。除V品种外,雌性胸肉的亮度(L)显著高于其他品种(P<0.05),红度(a)显著高于G品种(P<0.05)。G、V品种胸脯肉黄度(b)较高,除G品种外,雄性均高于雌性。由此可见,G、V品种表现优异,S、W品种肉质优异。(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信