WHAT IS YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF SPINAL AND EPIDURAL ATTEMPT?

S. Yahya, A. Siddiqui
{"title":"WHAT IS YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF SPINAL AND EPIDURAL ATTEMPT?","authors":"S. Yahya, A. Siddiqui","doi":"10.37029/JCAS.V4I2.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The practice of spinal and epidural anaesthesia is well established the world over for a number of years. Sighting of spinal or epidural is conducted through various approaches at various levels of the spinal column. The number of attempts has its correlation with the post-spinal and epidural complications.Aim: The aim is to gather information about the understanding among the anaesthetists about the spinal/epidural attempt.Materials and Methods: A pro forma comprising of nine closed-loop questions was distributed to all the participants in the study, and they were requested to fill it anonymously and placed it back in a designated sealed box in anaesthetic  office.Results: A total of 20 pro formas were distributed, and all of them received back with 100% responses. All the participants accepted universally that attempting through another space makes it a second attempt. One of the respondents thought any backward movement means 2nd attempt, the majority of the responders thought it does not count as an attempt. Almost everyone considered another attempt if a needle is completely withdrawn and enters through another puncture site whether through a midline or paramedian approach.Conclusion: Most of the complications after neuraxial blockade are associated with the number of attempts alongside other factors that may play a role. A universal definition of a spinal and epidural attempt may decrease the complications associated with the central neuraxial blockade.Key words: Epidural, single attempt, spinal","PeriodicalId":73631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37029/JCAS.V4I2.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The practice of spinal and epidural anaesthesia is well established the world over for a number of years. Sighting of spinal or epidural is conducted through various approaches at various levels of the spinal column. The number of attempts has its correlation with the post-spinal and epidural complications.Aim: The aim is to gather information about the understanding among the anaesthetists about the spinal/epidural attempt.Materials and Methods: A pro forma comprising of nine closed-loop questions was distributed to all the participants in the study, and they were requested to fill it anonymously and placed it back in a designated sealed box in anaesthetic  office.Results: A total of 20 pro formas were distributed, and all of them received back with 100% responses. All the participants accepted universally that attempting through another space makes it a second attempt. One of the respondents thought any backward movement means 2nd attempt, the majority of the responders thought it does not count as an attempt. Almost everyone considered another attempt if a needle is completely withdrawn and enters through another puncture site whether through a midline or paramedian approach.Conclusion: Most of the complications after neuraxial blockade are associated with the number of attempts alongside other factors that may play a role. A universal definition of a spinal and epidural attempt may decrease the complications associated with the central neuraxial blockade.Key words: Epidural, single attempt, spinal
你对脊髓和硬膜外尝试有何理解?
背景:脊髓和硬膜外麻醉的实践已经在世界各地建立了多年。脊髓或硬膜外的观察是通过不同的方法在脊柱的不同层次进行的。尝试次数与脊髓后和硬膜外并发症有关。目的:目的是收集麻醉师对脊髓/硬膜外麻醉的理解。材料与方法:我们向所有参与研究的参与者分发了一份由9个闭环问题组成的表格,请参与者匿名填写,并将表格放回麻醉办公室指定的密封盒子中。结果:共发放表格20份,均收到回复,回复率100%。所有的参与者都一致认为,通过另一个空间尝试是第二次尝试。有一个应答者认为任何向后的动作都意味着第二次尝试,大多数应答者认为这不算一次尝试。几乎每个人都考虑过,如果针头完全取出并通过另一个穿刺部位进入,无论是通过中线还是辅助入路。结论:大多数神经轴阻滞后的并发症与尝试次数以及其他可能起作用的因素有关。脊髓和硬膜外尝试的通用定义可能减少与中枢神经轴阻滞相关的并发症。关键词:硬膜外,单次尝试,脊柱
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信