Low-Dose Aspirin and Sporadic Anovulation in the EAGeR Randomized Trial

Rose G. Radin, L. Sjaarda, N. Perkins, R. Silver, Zhen Chen, Laurie L. Lesher, N. Galai, J. Wactawski‐Wende, S. Mumford, E. Schisterman
{"title":"Low-Dose Aspirin and Sporadic Anovulation in the EAGeR Randomized Trial","authors":"Rose G. Radin, L. Sjaarda, N. Perkins, R. Silver, Zhen Chen, Laurie L. Lesher, N. Galai, J. Wactawski‐Wende, S. Mumford, E. Schisterman","doi":"10.1210/jc.2016-2095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context Among women with a single, recent pregnancy loss, daily preconception low-dose aspirin (LDA) increased the live birth rate with no effect on pregnancy loss. Ovulation is a potential mechanism underlying this effect. Objective We estimated the effect of LDA on the per-cycle risk of anovulation among eumenorrheic women. Design Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of daily LDA on reproductive outcomes. Preconception follow-up lasted 1 to 6 menstrual cycles (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00467363). Setting Four US medical centers during 2007 to 2011. Patients or Other Participants Healthy women (n = 1214), age 18 to 40, were attempting pregnancy, had regular menstrual cycles (21 to 42 days), and had a history of 1 to 2 documented pregnancy losses, ≤2 live births, and no infertility. All participants completed at least 1 menstrual cycle of follow-up; none withdrew due to adverse events. Intervention Aspirin (81 mg) daily for 1 to 6 menstrual cycles. Main Outcome Measure Per-cycle risk of anovulation, defined as the absence of both a positive spot-urine pregnancy test and a luteinizing hormone (LH) peak (2.5-fold increase in daily urinary LH). Hypothesis formulation preceded data collection. Results Among 4340 cycles, LDA was not associated with anovulation (LDA: 13.4%, placebo: 11.1%; risk ratio = 1.16, 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.52). Results were similar among women with a single, recent loss. Conclusions Daily LDA had no effect on anovulation among women with a history of 1 to 2 pregnancy losses. LDA may affect fertility via other pathways, and these warrant further study.","PeriodicalId":22632,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"17 1","pages":"86–92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Context Among women with a single, recent pregnancy loss, daily preconception low-dose aspirin (LDA) increased the live birth rate with no effect on pregnancy loss. Ovulation is a potential mechanism underlying this effect. Objective We estimated the effect of LDA on the per-cycle risk of anovulation among eumenorrheic women. Design Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of daily LDA on reproductive outcomes. Preconception follow-up lasted 1 to 6 menstrual cycles (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00467363). Setting Four US medical centers during 2007 to 2011. Patients or Other Participants Healthy women (n = 1214), age 18 to 40, were attempting pregnancy, had regular menstrual cycles (21 to 42 days), and had a history of 1 to 2 documented pregnancy losses, ≤2 live births, and no infertility. All participants completed at least 1 menstrual cycle of follow-up; none withdrew due to adverse events. Intervention Aspirin (81 mg) daily for 1 to 6 menstrual cycles. Main Outcome Measure Per-cycle risk of anovulation, defined as the absence of both a positive spot-urine pregnancy test and a luteinizing hormone (LH) peak (2.5-fold increase in daily urinary LH). Hypothesis formulation preceded data collection. Results Among 4340 cycles, LDA was not associated with anovulation (LDA: 13.4%, placebo: 11.1%; risk ratio = 1.16, 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.52). Results were similar among women with a single, recent loss. Conclusions Daily LDA had no effect on anovulation among women with a history of 1 to 2 pregnancy losses. LDA may affect fertility via other pathways, and these warrant further study.
EAGeR随机试验中的低剂量阿司匹林和散发性无排卵
在最近一次流产的女性中,每日孕前低剂量阿司匹林(LDA)增加了活产率,但对流产没有影响。排卵是这种影响的潜在机制。目的评估LDA对痛经女性月经周期无排卵风险的影响。设计多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的每日LDA对生殖结局的影响试验。孕前随访持续1 - 6个月经周期(ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00467363)。以2007年至2011年期间的四个美国医疗中心为背景。患者或其他参与者健康女性(n = 1214),年龄18 ~ 40岁,尝试怀孕,月经周期规律(21 ~ 42天),有1 ~ 2次有记录的妊娠失败史,≤2次活产,无不孕。所有受试者完成至少1个月经周期的随访;没有人因不良事件退出。干预措施:阿司匹林(81毫克),每日1 - 6个月经周期。主要结果测量指标:每周期无排卵风险,定义为尿样妊娠试验阳性和黄体生成素(LH)峰值(每日尿LH升高2.5倍)均未出现。假设制定先于数据收集。结果在4340个周期中,LDA与无排卵无关(LDA: 13.4%,安慰剂:11.1%;风险比= 1.16,95%可信区间为0.88 ~ 1.52)。在最近一次减肥的女性中,结果也类似。结论每日LDA对有1 ~ 2次流产史的女性无排卵影响。LDA可能通过其他途径影响生育,这些值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信