CCI’s Jurisdictional Conflict with the Proposed Cement Industry Regulator: An Analysis

Pariekh Pandey
{"title":"CCI’s Jurisdictional Conflict with the Proposed Cement Industry Regulator: An Analysis","authors":"Pariekh Pandey","doi":"10.54425/ccijoclp.v3.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Controversial activities by manufacturers in the Indian cement industry have repeatedly invited investigations by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) for allegations of anti-competitive cartelising agreements. These manufacturing firms have created an artificial scarcity of production and supply in the market, using their association meetings as a front for illegal collusive activities. In spite of CCI having penalised the firms for their activities, the continued cartelisation in the cement market has led the Indian government to propose the establishment of a cement and steel industry regulator for proper governance. Along these lines, this paper aims to achieve a middle ground for removing conflict and ensuring cooperation between CCI and the proposed regulator. The author takes the initiative to study the nature of the cartelising activities of Indian cement manufacturers and the action taken by CCI through analysing the stance of the Supreme Court on the primacy of institutions in competition law matters relating to the cement industry. The paper additionally discusses competition enforcement against cement cartels in China and South Africa—two developing nations competing with the growing Indian economy and facing the same issues of deep-rooted cartelisation in the cement industry.","PeriodicalId":68002,"journal":{"name":"竞争法律与政策评论","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"竞争法律与政策评论","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54425/ccijoclp.v3.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Controversial activities by manufacturers in the Indian cement industry have repeatedly invited investigations by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) for allegations of anti-competitive cartelising agreements. These manufacturing firms have created an artificial scarcity of production and supply in the market, using their association meetings as a front for illegal collusive activities. In spite of CCI having penalised the firms for their activities, the continued cartelisation in the cement market has led the Indian government to propose the establishment of a cement and steel industry regulator for proper governance. Along these lines, this paper aims to achieve a middle ground for removing conflict and ensuring cooperation between CCI and the proposed regulator. The author takes the initiative to study the nature of the cartelising activities of Indian cement manufacturers and the action taken by CCI through analysing the stance of the Supreme Court on the primacy of institutions in competition law matters relating to the cement industry. The paper additionally discusses competition enforcement against cement cartels in China and South Africa—two developing nations competing with the growing Indian economy and facing the same issues of deep-rooted cartelisation in the cement industry.
CCI与拟议的水泥行业监管机构的管辖权冲突:分析
印度水泥行业制造商有争议的活动一再招致印度竞争委员会(CCI)对反竞争卡特尔协议指控的调查。这些制造企业在市场上制造了人为的生产和供应短缺,利用他们的协会会议作为非法串通活动的幌子。尽管CCI对这些公司的活动进行了处罚,但水泥市场持续的卡特尔化导致印度政府提议建立一个水泥和钢铁行业监管机构,以进行适当的治理。沿着这些思路,本文旨在实现消除冲突和确保CCI与拟议监管机构之间合作的中间立场。作者通过分析最高法院在与水泥行业有关的竞争法事务中机构的首要地位的立场,主动研究了印度水泥制造商卡特尔活动的性质以及CCI采取的行动。本文还讨论了中国和南非对水泥卡特尔的竞争执法,这两个发展中国家与不断增长的印度经济竞争,面临着水泥行业根深蒂固的卡特尔化问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书