Brazil in the ILO Committee on Freedom of Association (CFA): The COVID-19 economic crisis and the possible new Labour Reforms

Antonio Rodrigues de Freitas Júnior, Victor Raduan Da Silva
{"title":"Brazil in the ILO Committee on Freedom of Association (CFA): The COVID-19 economic crisis and the possible new Labour Reforms","authors":"Antonio Rodrigues de Freitas Júnior, Victor Raduan Da Silva","doi":"10.31261/zpppips.2022.20.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2018, the Committee on Freedom of Association (CFA) of the International Labour Organization (ILO) released its Annual Report showing a puzzling scenario: around 50% of the complaints – 1,681 out of 3,336 – presented before the Committee since its creation have come from Latin America. If we analyse the last 10 years – i.e. from 2008 to 2018 – we find out a more astonishing situation: around 67% of the complaints – 477 out of 708 – came from Latin America. This Latin-American presence in the CFA may become even greater due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as economic downturns often impact labour rights. By the way, it was during an economic crisis in Brazil that the 2017 Labour Reform – symbolized by Law No. 13,467/2017, in force since November that year – was passed, remodelling some of the Labour Law pillars in the country. On the ILO Normlex website, we notice that three Brazilian complaints were sent to the CFA after November 2017: Cases No. 3327, 3344, and 3355. They may show us how freedom of association has been recently treated in diverse economic sectors, as well as sow the seeds of Labour Reforms amid/after the COVID-19 economic crisis. This article utilizes observational/exploratory methods to analyse these three cases, pointing out if/how the core modifications of the 2017 Labour Reform in Brazil connect with the debates in the selected CFA Cases. All in all, what about next Reforms?","PeriodicalId":52556,"journal":{"name":"Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Spolecznej","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Spolecznej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31261/zpppips.2022.20.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2018, the Committee on Freedom of Association (CFA) of the International Labour Organization (ILO) released its Annual Report showing a puzzling scenario: around 50% of the complaints – 1,681 out of 3,336 – presented before the Committee since its creation have come from Latin America. If we analyse the last 10 years – i.e. from 2008 to 2018 – we find out a more astonishing situation: around 67% of the complaints – 477 out of 708 – came from Latin America. This Latin-American presence in the CFA may become even greater due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as economic downturns often impact labour rights. By the way, it was during an economic crisis in Brazil that the 2017 Labour Reform – symbolized by Law No. 13,467/2017, in force since November that year – was passed, remodelling some of the Labour Law pillars in the country. On the ILO Normlex website, we notice that three Brazilian complaints were sent to the CFA after November 2017: Cases No. 3327, 3344, and 3355. They may show us how freedom of association has been recently treated in diverse economic sectors, as well as sow the seeds of Labour Reforms amid/after the COVID-19 economic crisis. This article utilizes observational/exploratory methods to analyse these three cases, pointing out if/how the core modifications of the 2017 Labour Reform in Brazil connect with the debates in the selected CFA Cases. All in all, what about next Reforms?
巴西在国际劳工组织结社自由委员会:2019冠状病毒病经济危机和可能的新劳工改革
2018年,国际劳工组织(ILO)结社自由委员会(CFA)发布的年度报告显示了一个令人困惑的情况:自委员会成立以来,提交给该委员会的投诉中约有50%(3336件中有1681件)来自拉丁美洲。如果我们分析过去10年,即从2008年到2018年,我们会发现一个更惊人的情况:大约67%的投诉——708起投诉中有477起——来自拉丁美洲。由于经济衰退往往会影响劳工权利,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,拉丁美洲在CFA的存在可能会变得更大。顺便说一下,正是在巴西经济危机期间,以第13467 /2017号法律为标志的2017年劳工改革获得通过,自当年11月起生效,重塑了该国的一些劳动法支柱。在国际劳工组织Normlex网站上,我们注意到巴西在2017年11月之后向CFA提交了三起投诉:第3327、3344和3355号案件。它们可以向我们展示最近不同经济部门如何对待结社自由,也可以在新冠肺炎经济危机之后播下劳动改革的种子。本文采用观察/探索性方法分析这三个案例,指出2017年巴西劳动改革的核心修改是否/如何与选定的CFA案例中的辩论联系起来。总而言之,下一步的改革怎么办?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信