Nathaniel Hawthorne's Civil War

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
G. Hutner
{"title":"Nathaniel Hawthorne's Civil War","authors":"G. Hutner","doi":"10.1353/JNC.2021.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:How should literary historians measure a writer's understanding of war as it is witnessed and what effect that might have on literary reputation. The occasion for posing this question is Nathaniel Hawthorne's \"Chiefly about War Matters,\" his essay about a tour of Washington, DC, and environs during the second spring of the Civil War. The essay examines Hawthorne's understanding of the central conflict of his time and how, 160 years later, his article in the Atlantic magazine reveals some of his worst limitations as a cultural observer. Should we submit contemporary writers to similar tests? And when did the practice begin? To what end?","PeriodicalId":41876,"journal":{"name":"J19-The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists","volume":"14 1","pages":"137 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J19-The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JNC.2021.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:How should literary historians measure a writer's understanding of war as it is witnessed and what effect that might have on literary reputation. The occasion for posing this question is Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Chiefly about War Matters," his essay about a tour of Washington, DC, and environs during the second spring of the Civil War. The essay examines Hawthorne's understanding of the central conflict of his time and how, 160 years later, his article in the Atlantic magazine reveals some of his worst limitations as a cultural observer. Should we submit contemporary writers to similar tests? And when did the practice begin? To what end?
纳撒尼尔·霍桑的《内战
摘要:文学史家应该如何衡量作家对战争的理解,以及战争对文学声誉的影响。提出这个问题的契机是纳撒尼尔·霍桑的《主要是关于战争问题》,他的文章讲述了内战第二春期间华盛顿特区及其周边地区的旅行。本文考察了霍桑对他那个时代的中心冲突的理解,以及160年后,他在《大西洋》杂志上发表的文章如何揭示了他作为一个文化观察者的一些最严重的局限性。我们应该让当代作家接受类似的测试吗?什么时候开始的?目的是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信