Comparison of single and ensemble-based convolutional neural networks for cancerous image classification

IF 0.3 Q4 MATHEMATICS
Oktavian Lantang, G. Terdik, A. Hajdu, Attila Tiba
{"title":"Comparison of single and ensemble-based convolutional neural networks for cancerous image classification","authors":"Oktavian Lantang, G. Terdik, A. Hajdu, Attila Tiba","doi":"10.33039/AMI.2021.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we investigated the ability of several Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models for predicting the spread of cancer using medical images. We used a dataset released by the Kaggle, namely PatchCamelyon. The dataset consists of 220,025 pathology images digitized by a tissue scanner. A clinical expert labeled each image as cancerous or non-cancerous. We used 70% of the images as a training set and 30% of them as a validation set. We design three models based on three commonly used modules: VGG, Inception, and Residual Network (ResNet), to develop an ensemble model and implement a voting system to determine the final decision. Then, we compared the performance of this ensemble model to the performance of each single model. Additionally, we used a weighted majority voting system, where the final prediction is equal to the weighted average of the prediction produced by each network. Our results show that the classification of the two ensemble models reaches 96%. Thus these results prove that the ensemble model outperforms single network architectures.","PeriodicalId":43454,"journal":{"name":"Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33039/AMI.2021.03.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, we investigated the ability of several Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models for predicting the spread of cancer using medical images. We used a dataset released by the Kaggle, namely PatchCamelyon. The dataset consists of 220,025 pathology images digitized by a tissue scanner. A clinical expert labeled each image as cancerous or non-cancerous. We used 70% of the images as a training set and 30% of them as a validation set. We design three models based on three commonly used modules: VGG, Inception, and Residual Network (ResNet), to develop an ensemble model and implement a voting system to determine the final decision. Then, we compared the performance of this ensemble model to the performance of each single model. Additionally, we used a weighted majority voting system, where the final prediction is equal to the weighted average of the prediction produced by each network. Our results show that the classification of the two ensemble models reaches 96%. Thus these results prove that the ensemble model outperforms single network architectures.
基于单个和集成的卷积神经网络在癌症图像分类中的比较
在这项工作中,我们研究了几种卷积神经网络(CNN)模型使用医学图像预测癌症扩散的能力。我们使用了Kaggle发布的数据集,即PatchCamelyon。该数据集由组织扫描仪数字化的220,025张病理图像组成。一位临床专家将每张图像标记为癌变或非癌变。我们使用70%的图像作为训练集,30%作为验证集。我们基于VGG、Inception和Residual Network (ResNet)三个常用模块设计了三个模型,开发了一个集成模型,并实现了一个投票系统来确定最终决策。然后,我们将该集成模型的性能与每个单个模型的性能进行了比较。此外,我们使用了加权多数投票系统,其中最终预测等于每个网络产生的预测的加权平均值。结果表明,两种集合模型的分类率达到96%。因此,这些结果证明了集成模型优于单一网络体系结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信