Modification of the simplified PESI score to identify low risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism

Diana Paulina Chiluiza Reyes, E. Barbero, A. Quezada, E. Mercedes, F. León, D. Jiménez
{"title":"Modification of the simplified PESI score to identify low risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism","authors":"Diana Paulina Chiluiza Reyes, E. Barbero, A. Quezada, E. Mercedes, F. León, D. Jiménez","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa3643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score has been validated to identify low risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). Aim: To evaluate if the modification in the cut-off value of the heart rate in the sPESI score increases its sensitivity without affecting its clinical utility. Material and Methods: We used the data set of the multicentric study PROTECT, which analysed a variety of prognostic tools in 848 normotensive patients with acute symptomatic PE from 12 different Spanish hospitals. The heart rate cut-off value was modified (positive if ≥100/bpm). The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality during the first 30 days of treatment. The secondary efficacy outcome was a composite of complicated clinical course elements, defined as all-cause mortality, hemodynamic shock or non-fatal thromboembolism recurrence during the first 30 days of treatment. Results: The modified simplified PESI score identified 249 low risk patients (29%, confidence interval [CI] 95%, 26-33%) compared to 37% detected with the original sPESI score. The sensitivity of the modified sPESI for all-cause mortality, PE mortality and complicated clinical course was 100% (CI 95%, 89-100%), 100% (CI 95%, 68-99%) and 97%(CI 95%, 88-99%) respectively, compared to 97%(CI 95%, 85-100%), 91% (CI 95%, 57-100%) and 92% (CI 95%, 82-97%) of the original score. Conclusions: The modification in the cut-off value of the heart rate in the sPESI score diminished its clinical utility but at the same time it increased its sensitivity to identify normotensive patients with PE and low mortality and short-term complications risk.","PeriodicalId":20797,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary embolism","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary embolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa3643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score has been validated to identify low risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). Aim: To evaluate if the modification in the cut-off value of the heart rate in the sPESI score increases its sensitivity without affecting its clinical utility. Material and Methods: We used the data set of the multicentric study PROTECT, which analysed a variety of prognostic tools in 848 normotensive patients with acute symptomatic PE from 12 different Spanish hospitals. The heart rate cut-off value was modified (positive if ≥100/bpm). The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality during the first 30 days of treatment. The secondary efficacy outcome was a composite of complicated clinical course elements, defined as all-cause mortality, hemodynamic shock or non-fatal thromboembolism recurrence during the first 30 days of treatment. Results: The modified simplified PESI score identified 249 low risk patients (29%, confidence interval [CI] 95%, 26-33%) compared to 37% detected with the original sPESI score. The sensitivity of the modified sPESI for all-cause mortality, PE mortality and complicated clinical course was 100% (CI 95%, 89-100%), 100% (CI 95%, 68-99%) and 97%(CI 95%, 88-99%) respectively, compared to 97%(CI 95%, 85-100%), 91% (CI 95%, 57-100%) and 92% (CI 95%, 82-97%) of the original score. Conclusions: The modification in the cut-off value of the heart rate in the sPESI score diminished its clinical utility but at the same time it increased its sensitivity to identify normotensive patients with PE and low mortality and short-term complications risk.
改进简化PESI评分以识别急性症状性肺栓塞低危患者
简化肺栓塞严重程度指数(PESI)评分已被验证用于识别低风险急性症状性肺栓塞(PE)患者。目的:评价sPESI评分中心率临界值的修改是否在不影响其临床应用的前提下提高了其敏感性。材料和方法:我们使用了多中心研究PROTECT的数据集,该研究分析了来自西班牙12家不同医院的848名患有急性症状性肺动脉栓塞的正常血压患者的各种预后工具。修改心率临界值(≥100/bpm为阳性)。主要疗效指标为治疗前30天的全因死亡率。次要疗效结果是复杂临床过程要素的综合,定义为治疗前30天内的全因死亡率、血流动力学休克或非致死性血栓栓塞复发。结果:改进的简化PESI评分确定了249例低风险患者(29%,置信区间[CI] 95%, 26-33%),而原始spi评分则为37%。改良sPESI对全因死亡率、PE死亡率和复杂临床病程的敏感性分别为100% (CI 95%, 89-100%)、100% (CI 95%, 68-99%)和97%(CI 95%, 88-99%),而原始评分的敏感性分别为97%(CI 95%, 85-100%)、91% (CI 95%, 57-100%)和92% (CI 95%, 82-97%)。结论:sPESI评分中心率临界值的修改降低了其临床应用价值,但同时提高了其识别血压正常的PE患者、低死亡率和短期并发症风险的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信