Herwaardering van Grotius’ De satisfactione

Q4 Arts and Humanities
R. P. Hoogenboom
{"title":"Herwaardering van Grotius’ De satisfactione","authors":"R. P. Hoogenboom","doi":"10.21827/tr.66.2.125-143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grotius refuted Socinus’ attack on the Reformed theory of satisfaction in his De satisfaction, which contains a translation of the doctrine of satisfaction into a legal framework, but it was not understood by everyone. On its surface and within the broader context of De satisfactione, Grotius’ statements about punishment demanded by the common good and the relaxatio of the law, have been misinterpreted to say that Grotius deviated from the orthodox theory of satisfaction. A close analysis of De satisfactione, however, shows that Grotius is closely aligned with Reformed doctrine of satisfaction. As an Arminian Grotius only deviates from the later formulated Canons of Dort about the extent of the atonement.","PeriodicalId":36470,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/tr.66.2.125-143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grotius refuted Socinus’ attack on the Reformed theory of satisfaction in his De satisfaction, which contains a translation of the doctrine of satisfaction into a legal framework, but it was not understood by everyone. On its surface and within the broader context of De satisfactione, Grotius’ statements about punishment demanded by the common good and the relaxatio of the law, have been misinterpreted to say that Grotius deviated from the orthodox theory of satisfaction. A close analysis of De satisfactione, however, shows that Grotius is closely aligned with Reformed doctrine of satisfaction. As an Arminian Grotius only deviates from the later formulated Canons of Dort about the extent of the atonement.
重新评价格老秀斯的满意
格劳修斯在他的《论满足》中驳斥了梭西纳斯对改革宗满意理论的攻击,其中包含了将满意学说翻译成法律框架的内容,但并不是每个人都能理解。从表面上看,在更广泛的《论满足》的背景下,格劳秀斯关于共同利益和放松法律所要求的惩罚的陈述,被误解为格劳秀斯偏离了正统的满足理论。然而,对满意论的仔细分析表明,格劳秀斯与改革宗的满意学说密切相关。作为一名阿民念主义者,格劳秀斯只是偏离了后来制定的关于赎罪程度的波特信条。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信