Learning Models to Improved Mathematical Communication Skills

B. Purwanto, Icha Jusmalisa, I. Sari, A. Jatmiko, Andika Eko Pasetiyo
{"title":"Learning Models to Improved Mathematical Communication Skills","authors":"B. Purwanto, Icha Jusmalisa, I. Sari, A. Jatmiko, Andika Eko Pasetiyo","doi":"10.24042/djm.v3i1.5650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem faced by students in slow learning is in terms of communication. The use of Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) and Cooperative Think Pair Share (TPS) types is needed to help students communicate mathematically in expressing mathematical ideas. This study aims to determine whether or not there are differences in mathematical communication skills of students using the Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) learning model with students who use Think Pair Share (TPS) Cooperative learning models. This research uses a quantitative approach using the Quasi Experiment method. The research design is in the form of posttest only, non-equivalent group design. Testing data using the T test with Independent Samples T-Test. Based on the results of hypothesis testing obtained p-value> α 0.05. So it was concluded that there were indications of differences between Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) learning models with (TPS) Cooperative learning models and superior (AIR) learning models compared to Cooperative learning models of (TPS) Type in influencing students' mathematical communication skills.","PeriodicalId":11442,"journal":{"name":"Dwight's Journal of Music","volume":"24 1","pages":"7-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dwight's Journal of Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v3i1.5650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The problem faced by students in slow learning is in terms of communication. The use of Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) and Cooperative Think Pair Share (TPS) types is needed to help students communicate mathematically in expressing mathematical ideas. This study aims to determine whether or not there are differences in mathematical communication skills of students using the Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) learning model with students who use Think Pair Share (TPS) Cooperative learning models. This research uses a quantitative approach using the Quasi Experiment method. The research design is in the form of posttest only, non-equivalent group design. Testing data using the T test with Independent Samples T-Test. Based on the results of hypothesis testing obtained p-value> α 0.05. So it was concluded that there were indications of differences between Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) learning models with (TPS) Cooperative learning models and superior (AIR) learning models compared to Cooperative learning models of (TPS) Type in influencing students' mathematical communication skills.
提高数学沟通能力的学习模式
慢速学习的学生面临的问题是在沟通方面。需要使用听觉、智力、重复(AIR)和合作思维对分享(TPS)类型来帮助学生在表达数学思想时进行数学交流。本研究旨在探讨使用听觉、智力、重复(AIR)学习模式的学生与使用思维对分享(TPS)合作学习模式的学生在数学沟通技巧上是否存在差异。本研究采用准实验方法进行定量分析。研究设计仅采用后测形式,非等效组设计。使用独立样本T检验检验数据。根据假设检验结果得到p值> α 0.05。综上所述,与(TPS)型合作学习模式相比,(TPS)型的听觉、智力、重复(AIR)学习模式和(AIR)学习模式对学生数学沟通能力的影响存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信