Early Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Prediabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials [ID: 1377137]

K. Hessami, Lorie M. Harper, A. Shamshirsaz, E. Werner
{"title":"Early Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Prediabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials [ID: 1377137]","authors":"K. Hessami, Lorie M. Harper, A. Shamshirsaz, E. Werner","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000930124.76180.1e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis aims to determine whether early treatment of hyperglycemia in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and prediabetic pregnancies improve perinatal outcomes. METHODS: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science were systematically searched up to June 30, 2022. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of early treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus (International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups [IADPSG] or Carpenter and Coustan [C&C] criteria) and prediabetes (HbA1c 5.7–6.4%) before 20 weeks of gestation were considered eligible. Random-effects model meta-analysis was used to pool the odds ratios (OR) and/or mean differences (MD) with 95% CI. Furthermore, subgroup analysis was performed stratifying by indication for intervention (GDM versus prediabetic). RESULTS: Seven RCTs including 2,757 pregnant individuals, of whom 647 had positive screening before 20 weeks of gestation, were included. Of 647 individuals, 346 were allocated to early treatment and 301 to the routine treatment. There was no significant difference in terms of gestational age at delivery (MD –0.21 [95% CI: −0.44, 0.02], P=.089), rate of cesarean delivery (OR 0.93 [95% CI: 0.64, 1.34], P=.394), hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (OR 1.19 [95% CI: 0.59, 2.39], P=.341), any diabetic medication use (OR 1.31 [95% CI: 0.89, 1.93], P=.177), and neonatal hypoglycemia (OR 1.02 [95% CI: 0.50, 2.08], P=.952). However, there was a decreased risk of macrosomia (OR 0.42 [95% CI: 0.19, 0.92], P=.031) and increased need for insulin use (OR 2.23 [95% CI: 1.30, 3.84], P=.004) for early treatment group. After separate analyses on GDM and prediabetics as distinct groups, the risk of macrosomia was not decreased for GDM and prediabetic subgroups after early treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment in early pregnancy for GDM or prediabetes does not appear to improve the maternal or neonatal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930124.76180.1e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis aims to determine whether early treatment of hyperglycemia in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and prediabetic pregnancies improve perinatal outcomes. METHODS: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science were systematically searched up to June 30, 2022. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of early treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus (International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups [IADPSG] or Carpenter and Coustan [C&C] criteria) and prediabetes (HbA1c 5.7–6.4%) before 20 weeks of gestation were considered eligible. Random-effects model meta-analysis was used to pool the odds ratios (OR) and/or mean differences (MD) with 95% CI. Furthermore, subgroup analysis was performed stratifying by indication for intervention (GDM versus prediabetic). RESULTS: Seven RCTs including 2,757 pregnant individuals, of whom 647 had positive screening before 20 weeks of gestation, were included. Of 647 individuals, 346 were allocated to early treatment and 301 to the routine treatment. There was no significant difference in terms of gestational age at delivery (MD –0.21 [95% CI: −0.44, 0.02], P=.089), rate of cesarean delivery (OR 0.93 [95% CI: 0.64, 1.34], P=.394), hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (OR 1.19 [95% CI: 0.59, 2.39], P=.341), any diabetic medication use (OR 1.31 [95% CI: 0.89, 1.93], P=.177), and neonatal hypoglycemia (OR 1.02 [95% CI: 0.50, 2.08], P=.952). However, there was a decreased risk of macrosomia (OR 0.42 [95% CI: 0.19, 0.92], P=.031) and increased need for insulin use (OR 2.23 [95% CI: 1.30, 3.84], P=.004) for early treatment group. After separate analyses on GDM and prediabetics as distinct groups, the risk of macrosomia was not decreased for GDM and prediabetic subgroups after early treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment in early pregnancy for GDM or prediabetes does not appear to improve the maternal or neonatal outcomes.
妊娠期糖尿病和前驱糖尿病的早期治疗:随机临床试验的系统回顾和meta分析[j]
本荟萃分析旨在确定早期治疗妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)和糖尿病前期妊娠的高血糖是否能改善围产儿结局。方法:系统检索截至2022年6月30日的PubMed/Medline、EMBASE、ClinicalTrials.gov和Web of Science。早期治疗妊娠期糖尿病(国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组协会[IADPSG]或Carpenter and Coustan [C&C]标准)和妊娠20周前前驱糖尿病(HbA1c 5.7-6.4%)的随机临床试验(rct)被认为符合条件。随机效应模型荟萃分析采用95% CI合并优势比(OR)和/或平均差异(MD)。此外,根据干预适应症(GDM与前驱糖尿病)进行亚组分析。结果:纳入7项随机对照试验,共纳入2757例孕妇,其中647例妊娠20周前筛查阳性。在647个人中,346人被分配到早期治疗,301人被分配到常规治疗。分娩时胎龄(MD = -0.21 [95% CI: - 0.44, 0.02], P= 0.089)、剖宫产率(OR = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.64, 1.34], P= 0.394)、妊娠高血压疾病(OR = 1.19 [95% CI: 0.59, 2.39], P= 0.341)、任何糖尿病药物的使用(OR 1.31 [95% CI: 0.89, 1.93], P= 0.177)和新生儿低血糖(OR 1.02 [95% CI: 0.50, 2.08], P= 0.952)均无显著差异。然而,早期治疗组发生巨大儿的风险降低(OR为0.42 [95% CI: 0.19, 0.92], P= 0.031),胰岛素使用需求增加(OR为2.23 [95% CI: 1.30, 3.84], P= 0.004)。在将GDM和前驱糖尿病作为不同的组进行单独分析后,GDM和前驱糖尿病亚组在早期治疗后发生巨大儿的风险并未降低。结论:妊娠早期治疗GDM或前驱糖尿病并不能改善产妇或新生儿的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信